Image via h.andras_xms.
The Geek Squad has been known for their file-rifling, porn-stealing issues for a while (thanks to Consumerist). But only when local blogger Ariel Waldman asked about their classic, “it’s sex so who cares” issues at a San Francisco marketing and customer service summit conference, did Best Buy’s Geek Squad’s privacy, porn, sex and anti-blogger attitude come to light. (Long after everyone who read a blog knew that Geek Squad had been going through users’ personal files, and learned the disgusting truth when a guilt-racked Best Buy employee was the whistle blower on what they all did with porn performer Jasmine Grey‘s trust and livelihood — fessing up only after Grey died in a tragic car crash.) On video: Ariel asked, and Eddie caught it on film. Plus *more*… We are the media, indeed — this week’s column is The Geek Squad’s ongoing porn problem / Bloggers catch the tech service pilfering porn and it turns into a local PR disaster, while Violet Blue wonders ‘Is nothing sacred? Snip from the midsection:
(…) No public statements have been made from the Geek Squad’s PR department about the porn theft exposed by Consumerist, their exploitation of Jasmine Grey, or the Geek Squad’s practice of examining their customers’ files during the process of equipment repair.
That is, until the Customer Service is the New Marketing summit and conference here in San Francisco two weeks ago. The Geek Squad came with a team who hovered on a balcony over the conference while Geek Squad founder Robert Stephens took the stage for his talk, entitled “Marketing is a Tax You Pay for Being Unremarkable.” Little did he realize that while he was onstage, there were full-on back-channel conversations on various social networking instant message sites about Geek Squad’s nonconsensual “customer service.”
So when it came time for Q & A, local blogger, respected social community management expert, professional social media insights consultant, Engadget columnist, and community manager for Pownce Ariel Waldman spoke up.
Rather than drop off Stephens at Kink.com for a lesson in respect at the (feminist-identified) boot heels of Princess Donna, Waldman asked Stephens for a statement in front of his peers, asking what kind of outreach the Geek Squad plans on doing to make their customers feel safe from exploitation like this in the future.
“Robert’s response immediately jumped into a cringe-worthy response, by saying first and foremost that bloggers are not journalists and don’t ever hold themselves to the same standards as journalists. He then called out Ben Popken from Consumerist for asking for his response to these issues, but having already published the story. He said if bloggers publish the story first without waiting for his response that it’s not a 2-way conversation and he just won’t respond to it at all. He said bloggers will need to someday need to hold themselves to journalist standards because they have far too much competition to not to.So, he didn’t answer AT ALL about things they’re trying to do to make people or their customers feel better about these issues. He was defensive about the question, instead of being sensitive to the issue, which was disappointing. If you’re for enabling conversation within your company, you should be for enabling positive conversation online as well, instead of writing it off as bloggers only being a form of disrespectful trolls.”
Personally, my reaction would have been to get on the Ocean with Princess Donna for an emergency takedown, followed by a trip to the Armory for some serious blogosphere discipline and knee-pad-needed lessons in sexual privacy. Followed by a dog-collar-and-leash march over to the Electronic Frontier Foundation for more sexual identity and privacy deprogramming.
According to Consumerist in the breakout post “Geek Squad Hatched Plot To Harvest Porn From Pornstar Jasmine Grey’s Hard Drive, Days Before She Died In Car Crash,” it wasn’t an isolated employee (or ‘one luggage handler,’ as Stephens might say): An entire team passed Jasmine Grey‘s pictures around. The Geek Squad whistle-blower told Consumerist (…) Link.
Hey! Notice anything different around here? Leave a comment of love for the man behind the curtain and tell me what you think (in the WTFMTFBBQ comments!? Do they work?), and the hours of non-paid volunteer work which made the beginning of tinynibbles version xxx.666 (aka version puttytat) possible. Thank you 0x0000 (Jonathan Moore)! The redesign is making me drool and quiver… It’s gorgeous. I no longer have to fire up 2 old computers and an external hard drive to make a change to my site!
Aaaand: I’m deeply conflicted about the beginning, but as you might have already seen on Laughing Squid — I’m an (and on) Internet Superstar. The interview (halfway through) is one of the best I’ve done *ever* and I really like Martin Sargent way too much, and I’m frighteningly happy about the interview itself. I just regret the way too long, passe and pastiche intro jokes about something, that as a friend put in an email yesterday: “(…) this woman has used and abused your name and cost you time, money, blood, sweat, and tears. You never should have had to suffer this indignity.” (Like her recent pregnant gangbang porn a friend just told me about found on a clip site, for example… Ugh. ***see update*** ) Still, it’s a great interview and you see me admit how tough it is to be me and be a flawed human who dates, and the embarrassingly obvious things on my sexual “to-do” lists. I look way better in the (unscripted) interview than in the still-frame shot, and endless thanks to the love @ Madame S for providing the sex toy props to help me keep Sargent under control.
***Update: “I met with Ms. Johnson and she assures me that the statements my friend made to me mischaracterizes the situation.”
Enjoy the new blog… I’ve never been so stoked about my blog (= my life) ever! Except I’m still having problems making it look right in drafts or if I have links *really* linked… Patience and love, please :D
Geek Squad fun update: A reader emailed me this so we can all make patches and wear them (thanks, S!)…