<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for violet blue ® :: open source sex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 00:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on while you were reading 1000 comments by Kaija</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/while-you-were-reading-1000-comments.html#comment-1776</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaija</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1952#comment-1776</guid>
		<description>I like the fun links....thanks for the list, and I like that there is certainly "something for everyone."  It's 4th of July and I have ventured outside of my usual "family of choice" clique to attend a friend of a friend's BBQ and wow...I forgot what "normal people" are like (ok, but rather uptight and boring compared to my rainbow of freaky pals).  Had to stop in here for a breath of fresh air ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the fun links&#8230;.thanks for the list, and I like that there is certainly &#8220;something for everyone.&#8221;  It&#8217;s 4th of July and I have ventured outside of my usual &#8220;family of choice&#8221; clique to attend a friend of a friend&#8217;s BBQ and wow&#8230;I forgot what &#8220;normal people&#8221; are like (ok, but rather uptight and boring compared to my rainbow of freaky pals).  Had to stop in here for a breath of fresh air ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by violet</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1775</link>
		<dc:creator>violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1775</guid>
		<description>Globe and Mail weighs in on the coverup, interesting perspective: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080704.wgtfridayreads0704/BNStory/Technology/home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Globe and Mail weighs in on the coverup, interesting perspective: <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080704.wgtfridayreads0704/BNStory/Technology/home" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080704.wgtfridayreads0704/BNStory/Technology/home</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by Dustin Lacina</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1771</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Lacina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1771</guid>
		<description>I just dropped this on BB.  We'll see how long it lasts (none of my other comments ever have).  But I think it goes a long way to explain the psychology of why this has become such a monster.


The fact that many BB supporters at the moment (and BB themselves) keep feeling the need to bring up that this is a "PERSONAL" project/blog/whatever is distressing to me.

It's only personal in that, it's owned by them.  Which, great, do whatever you want with it.  But don't forget, the INSTANT you release something to the public, it is no longer your own.

Any writer worth their salt knows this.  Any artist, any journalist, anyone who labors (even if only for love) and shares their work PUBLICLY must understand this.  Or they better never step into the public realm.

Yeah, it was yours, until you hit submit.  And then it became the product of the world.  Which is odd because I thought that BB understood this with the constant ranting against Copyright.  Yes, I know they are different, but conceptually the BB argument and mine are intertwined.

BB needs to understand that, this may have started as a personal thing, but it was only personal until the first person got their hands on the original stapled copy.  And once it got online, it became even more personal.

And so, when they hide behind the "It's our site, we can do what we want" defense, it smacks of naivety and makes them lose credibility.  

Add to that the circular and vague explanation of their actions and it just widens the gulf between them and credibility.  They're not journalists.  They're bloggers.  But they still have responsibilities.  And the handling of this shows that they either don't understand, or care for these responsibilities.

And that's sad, because unfortunately, BB is one of the things that sets the standards for how the web and the people using it should act and behave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just dropped this on BB.  We&#8217;ll see how long it lasts (none of my other comments ever have).  But I think it goes a long way to explain the psychology of why this has become such a monster.</p>
<p>The fact that many BB supporters at the moment (and BB themselves) keep feeling the need to bring up that this is a &#8220;PERSONAL&#8221; project/blog/whatever is distressing to me.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s only personal in that, it&#8217;s owned by them.  Which, great, do whatever you want with it.  But don&#8217;t forget, the INSTANT you release something to the public, it is no longer your own.</p>
<p>Any writer worth their salt knows this.  Any artist, any journalist, anyone who labors (even if only for love) and shares their work PUBLICLY must understand this.  Or they better never step into the public realm.</p>
<p>Yeah, it was yours, until you hit submit.  And then it became the product of the world.  Which is odd because I thought that BB understood this with the constant ranting against Copyright.  Yes, I know they are different, but conceptually the BB argument and mine are intertwined.</p>
<p>BB needs to understand that, this may have started as a personal thing, but it was only personal until the first person got their hands on the original stapled copy.  And once it got online, it became even more personal.</p>
<p>And so, when they hide behind the &#8220;It&#8217;s our site, we can do what we want&#8221; defense, it smacks of naivety and makes them lose credibility.  </p>
<p>Add to that the circular and vague explanation of their actions and it just widens the gulf between them and credibility.  They&#8217;re not journalists.  They&#8217;re bloggers.  But they still have responsibilities.  And the handling of this shows that they either don&#8217;t understand, or care for these responsibilities.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s sad, because unfortunately, BB is one of the things that sets the standards for how the web and the people using it should act and behave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on while you were reading 1000 comments by Mat Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/while-you-were-reading-1000-comments.html#comment-1769</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1952#comment-1769</guid>
		<description>Nicely handled. Stay classy, vb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely handled. Stay classy, vb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by violet</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>answered my own question: here's one of Pesco's that was deleted: http://web.archive.org/web/0/boingboing.net/2005/05/27/transparent_tape_scu.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>answered my own question: here&#8217;s one of Pesco&#8217;s that was deleted: <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/0/boingboing.net/2005/05/27/transparent_tape_scu.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/0/boingboing.net/2005/05/27/transparent_tape_scu.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by violet</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1767</link>
		<dc:creator>violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1767</guid>
		<description>wow -- great post, and this comment floored me:
http://www.zenarchery.com/2008/07/01/that-violet-blue-thing-boing-boing/#comment-2384</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow &#8212; great post, and this comment floored me:<br />
<a href="http://www.zenarchery.com/2008/07/01/that-violet-blue-thing-boing-boing/#comment-2384" rel="nofollow">http://www.zenarchery.com/2008/07/01/that-violet-blue-thing-boing-boing/#comment-2384</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on while you were reading 1000 comments by Jairus</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/while-you-were-reading-1000-comments.html#comment-1766</link>
		<dc:creator>Jairus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1952#comment-1766</guid>
		<description>Let's hear it for the I.B.T.T.!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hear it for the I.B.T.T.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on we won by violet</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/we-won.html#comment-1765</link>
		<dc:creator>violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1948#comment-1765</guid>
		<description>you know, I think "unpublishing" is making everyone cranky. especially me ;)

I wish I could buy all the tiny nibbles commenters -- and me -- a drink, or some ice cream, or hand out free lube samples or something. knowwhatimean? I appreciate all the views in this thread; my marriage didn't work, but I know ones that really do. it is what it is. I don't know what marriage would *ever* look like for me at this point, but I bow (in a short skirt, of course) in the direction of those hot and heavy happy married couples.

now, I think I need to shake down a sex toy company for presents for tiny nibbles commenters. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know, I think &#8220;unpublishing&#8221; is making everyone cranky. especially me ;)</p>
<p>I wish I could buy all the tiny nibbles commenters &#8212; and me &#8212; a drink, or some ice cream, or hand out free lube samples or something. knowwhatimean? I appreciate all the views in this thread; my marriage didn&#8217;t work, but I know ones that really do. it is what it is. I don&#8217;t know what marriage would *ever* look like for me at this point, but I bow (in a short skirt, of course) in the direction of those hot and heavy happy married couples.</p>
<p>now, I think I need to shake down a sex toy company for presents for tiny nibbles commenters. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by Grace</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1764</link>
		<dc:creator>Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1764</guid>
		<description>It's the same as "slut-shunning*" back in those long ago school days. I didn't go along with it then, I'm not going along with it now.

*Goes like this:
Someone to someone else: "Put out! Put out! Put out!"
Someone else: :puts out:
Someone to everyone else: "OMG! Someone else is so gross! They PUT OUT!"
Everyone else: "EWWWWW! Stay away from someone else!"
Someone else, wondering: ...wtf...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the same as &#8220;slut-shunning*&#8221; back in those long ago school days. I didn&#8217;t go along with it then, I&#8217;m not going along with it now.</p>
<p>*Goes like this:<br />
Someone to someone else: &#8220;Put out! Put out! Put out!&#8221;<br />
Someone else: :puts out:<br />
Someone to everyone else: &#8220;OMG! Someone else is so gross! They PUT OUT!&#8221;<br />
Everyone else: &#8220;EWWWWW! Stay away from someone else!&#8221;<br />
Someone else, wondering: &#8230;wtf&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1763</guid>
		<description>Susannah has deleted &lt;b&gt;several entire blogs&lt;/b&gt; in the years I've been sex blogging, and when she does it, she never leaves behind so much as an "I'm outta here."  My theory is that from time to time, her discomfort with being a "sex blogger" or (this time) a "sex blogger" overwhelms her ability to cope with it.

Judging by one of the linked posts above, it looks like the most recent incarnation of The Reverse Cowgirl may be disappearing down the memory hole one day soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susannah has deleted <b>several entire blogs</b> in the years I&#8217;ve been sex blogging, and when she does it, she never leaves behind so much as an &#8220;I&#8217;m outta here.&#8221;  My theory is that from time to time, her discomfort with being a &#8220;sex blogger&#8221; or (this time) a &#8220;sex blogger&#8221; overwhelms her ability to cope with it.</p>
<p>Judging by one of the linked posts above, it looks like the most recent incarnation of The Reverse Cowgirl may be disappearing down the memory hole one day soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1762</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1762</guid>
		<description>this is pretty neat, you can see the missing posts here -- http://www.violetbluevioletblue.net/

via Digg: http://digg.com/celebrity/The_Violet_Blue_posts_that_were_unpublished_by_BoingBoing

it has me wondering, now that we know it was Xeni who deleted the posts, if any other authors' posts were removed in the purge.

and thanks everyone for the support and kind words. not too many of those about me going around lately. I'm making a point not to step into any of the allegations and character assassinations stuff. let me just say that insofar as "romance" goes, I was the pursued, not the pursuer. a lot of untrue things are being said about me, but it's interesting to see who's "teaming up" to vet their grievances with me or my work, and it's certainly agitated my stalkers, who have been eagerly jumping in the fray. I am going to have a very interesting book to write from all of this. also, @ MichaelK -- a close friend made a nickname for her a while back. he calls her The Obtuse Cowpat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is pretty neat, you can see the missing posts here &#8212; <a href="http://www.violetbluevioletblue.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.violetbluevioletblue.net/</a></p>
<p>via Digg: <a href="http://digg.com/celebrity/The_Violet_Blue_posts_that_were_unpublished_by_BoingBoing" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/celebrity/The_Violet_Blue_posts_that_were_unpublished_by_BoingBoing</a></p>
<p>it has me wondering, now that we know it was Xeni who deleted the posts, if any other authors&#8217; posts were removed in the purge.</p>
<p>and thanks everyone for the support and kind words. not too many of those about me going around lately. I&#8217;m making a point not to step into any of the allegations and character assassinations stuff. let me just say that insofar as &#8220;romance&#8221; goes, I was the pursued, not the pursuer. a lot of untrue things are being said about me, but it&#8217;s interesting to see who&#8217;s &#8220;teaming up&#8221; to vet their grievances with me or my work, and it&#8217;s certainly agitated my stalkers, who have been eagerly jumping in the fray. I am going to have a very interesting book to write from all of this. also, @ MichaelK &#8212; a close friend made a nickname for her a while back. he calls her The Obtuse Cowpat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by quixote23</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1761</link>
		<dc:creator>quixote23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1761</guid>
		<description>Last night I added my own voice to the 1300+ comments on the Boing Boing thread.  As someone who has been reading Boing Boing for almost a decade, and been a fan of Mark Frauenfelder's work in Mondo 2000 and The Happy Mutant's Handbook prior to that, I wanted to express my considered opinion on the matter, and that opinion was that when you have as much cultural sway as Boing Boing does, "unpublishing" a contributor's entire body of work from your website and then not coming clean on the reasons behind it veers dangerously close to a loss of integrity.  I mentioned my disappointment in Boing Boing and that this was the first time I've ever had doubts about their oft self-vaunted commitment to "transparency" and "full disclosure".  I spent over an hour composing my comment, attempting to be fair to both parties involved, and trying to weigh in diplomatically while still making my disappointment known.

This morning when I woke up, my comment had been deleted.  The comment immediately prior to it, as well as the one posted right after it, were still there.  

I have no idea what it was that I may have said, what toes I may have stepped on, when I clicked that submit button last night.  I'm a reasonable and open-minded person, not a troll, and instead of reacting emotionally as so many other commenters had, I was simply asking for more information before making up my mind on the matter.  Clearly I said something the bb editors felt was out of line and so instead of responding to it, they simply erased it.  And that was pretty eye-opening.

If Xeni would just pony up and clarify her rationale behind the move, I would be more than willing to consider it.  But instead, all I've seen are vague inferences to Violet's character as a person, strident claims that the bb editors are fully within their rights to do anything they want on the site without having to explain it to their readership, and self-righteous bullshit about how baffled they are that this has turned into such a big issue.  bb has every right to self-edit, but they do NOT have a right to take an action like this and then act like wide-eyed naifs about the response.  It's insulting to the intelligence of the readers.

And for that reason, I'm taking a break from Boing Boing right now.  It was a poor and foolish decision and I'm coming to realise that this may be the way they have chosen to approach the way they do business.  For all their up-in-arms declarations of the rights of consumers and the common folk, they're acting an awful lot like those corporate entities and organisations who refuse to submit to accountability to their core market.  They have a certain journalistic responsibility which they have no problem holding others to - traditional and blog journalists alike - but which they apparently consider themselves exempt from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night I added my own voice to the 1300+ comments on the Boing Boing thread.  As someone who has been reading Boing Boing for almost a decade, and been a fan of Mark Frauenfelder&#8217;s work in Mondo 2000 and The Happy Mutant&#8217;s Handbook prior to that, I wanted to express my considered opinion on the matter, and that opinion was that when you have as much cultural sway as Boing Boing does, &#8220;unpublishing&#8221; a contributor&#8217;s entire body of work from your website and then not coming clean on the reasons behind it veers dangerously close to a loss of integrity.  I mentioned my disappointment in Boing Boing and that this was the first time I&#8217;ve ever had doubts about their oft self-vaunted commitment to &#8220;transparency&#8221; and &#8220;full disclosure&#8221;.  I spent over an hour composing my comment, attempting to be fair to both parties involved, and trying to weigh in diplomatically while still making my disappointment known.</p>
<p>This morning when I woke up, my comment had been deleted.  The comment immediately prior to it, as well as the one posted right after it, were still there.  </p>
<p>I have no idea what it was that I may have said, what toes I may have stepped on, when I clicked that submit button last night.  I&#8217;m a reasonable and open-minded person, not a troll, and instead of reacting emotionally as so many other commenters had, I was simply asking for more information before making up my mind on the matter.  Clearly I said something the bb editors felt was out of line and so instead of responding to it, they simply erased it.  And that was pretty eye-opening.</p>
<p>If Xeni would just pony up and clarify her rationale behind the move, I would be more than willing to consider it.  But instead, all I&#8217;ve seen are vague inferences to Violet&#8217;s character as a person, strident claims that the bb editors are fully within their rights to do anything they want on the site without having to explain it to their readership, and self-righteous bullshit about how baffled they are that this has turned into such a big issue.  bb has every right to self-edit, but they do NOT have a right to take an action like this and then act like wide-eyed naifs about the response.  It&#8217;s insulting to the intelligence of the readers.</p>
<p>And for that reason, I&#8217;m taking a break from Boing Boing right now.  It was a poor and foolish decision and I&#8217;m coming to realise that this may be the way they have chosen to approach the way they do business.  For all their up-in-arms declarations of the rights of consumers and the common folk, they&#8217;re acting an awful lot like those corporate entities and organisations who refuse to submit to accountability to their core market.  They have a certain journalistic responsibility which they have no problem holding others to - traditional and blog journalists alike - but which they apparently consider themselves exempt from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by Dustin Lacina</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Lacina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>@MichaelK - I saw that post.  It made me giggle.  Mostly because, the whole time she's inside bitching about "hacks" she's not out LIVING IT ZOMG!  And what was with the token "just because" photo.  Distraction from her yawn-inducing, pointless, rant about writing and what makes a real writer?  


What really gets me about this whole thing and it's constant unfolding, is that, Boing Boing went and did their silly little interviews to TELL THE TRUE STORY...and of course, said absolutely nothing new.  And ALL of this "shitstorm" could have been avoided if they were just like "Yo, we didn't like X.  We did Y.  And you know, maybe we could have avoided Z.  But we just felt right about X and Y."  

And wtf is up with their moderators.  Damn.  Talk about psychotic.  BB needs some stelazine in the water stat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@MichaelK - I saw that post.  It made me giggle.  Mostly because, the whole time she&#8217;s inside bitching about &#8220;hacks&#8221; she&#8217;s not out LIVING IT ZOMG!  And what was with the token &#8220;just because&#8221; photo.  Distraction from her yawn-inducing, pointless, rant about writing and what makes a real writer?  </p>
<p>What really gets me about this whole thing and it&#8217;s constant unfolding, is that, Boing Boing went and did their silly little interviews to TELL THE TRUE STORY&#8230;and of course, said absolutely nothing new.  And ALL of this &#8220;shitstorm&#8221; could have been avoided if they were just like &#8220;Yo, we didn&#8217;t like X.  We did Y.  And you know, maybe we could have avoided Z.  But we just felt right about X and Y.&#8221;  </p>
<p>And wtf is up with their moderators.  Damn.  Talk about psychotic.  BB needs some stelazine in the water stat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by Dan Lyke</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Lyke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>Violet, I just wanted to say "thank you for taking the high road". For whatever reason, this little soap opera has sucked me in, and I've been poking around a bit and trying to figure out what happened.  It's plain in all of this that you're willing to let your public historical record speak for itself, all of your posts mentioning BoingBoing and its participants are intact, and you haven't been making unsubstantiated or ad-hominem attacks.

Or making links in my archives go mysteriously 404.

My only participation with any of the participants in this spat is to link to them occasionally, I don't really have a horse in this race except that I'm more likely to link to people I feel are worthy of promotion, so my stakes aren't that high, but I've formed some impressions based on how people are acting and reacting, and your reactions do you credit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Violet, I just wanted to say &#8220;thank you for taking the high road&#8221;. For whatever reason, this little soap opera has sucked me in, and I&#8217;ve been poking around a bit and trying to figure out what happened.  It&#8217;s plain in all of this that you&#8217;re willing to let your public historical record speak for itself, all of your posts mentioning BoingBoing and its participants are intact, and you haven&#8217;t been making unsubstantiated or ad-hominem attacks.</p>
<p>Or making links in my archives go mysteriously 404.</p>
<p>My only participation with any of the participants in this spat is to link to them occasionally, I don&#8217;t really have a horse in this race except that I&#8217;m more likely to link to people I feel are worthy of promotion, so my stakes aren&#8217;t that high, but I&#8217;ve formed some impressions based on how people are acting and reacting, and your reactions do you credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by Alex Ess</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1757</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Ess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1757</guid>
		<description>The too-vague-to-contradict character assassination shit they're trying to pull is just foul smelling. It's probably a good thing they're acting this way though;If they weren't trying so hard to get their readers to think of you as 'somehow' sinister without giving any specific reasons, I might have assumed that you must have done &lt;I&gt;something&lt;/I&gt;. I thank them for keeping me from making any stupid assumptions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The too-vague-to-contradict character assassination shit they&#8217;re trying to pull is just foul smelling. It&#8217;s probably a good thing they&#8217;re acting this way though;If they weren&#8217;t trying so hard to get their readers to think of you as &#8217;somehow&#8217; sinister without giving any specific reasons, I might have assumed that you must have done <i>something</i>. I thank them for keeping me from making any stupid assumptions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on do you want to play a game? by twizted</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/do-you-want-to-play-a-game.html#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>twizted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1949#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Hahaha. At least you seem to still be able to laugh a little at this ridiculous fiasco.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha. At least you seem to still be able to laugh a little at this ridiculous fiasco.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on pretty girl friday with andrew blake by Alex Braddock</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/pretty-girl-friday-with-andrew-blake.html#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Braddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1946#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>The original AB films were extremely good and had very good and real action whether straight or lez.
After a half dozen films (and the original ones were shot on film) his style emphasized the visual and not the sex.  Aria G. is the worst lez porn actress there is.  She hardly ever does _anything_.  He should sign up super cutie "Jo".  Breasts like that deserve immortality.
AB should get back to his actors and actresses actually having _real_ sex while maintaining the visual overload that is his hallmark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original AB films were extremely good and had very good and real action whether straight or lez.<br />
After a half dozen films (and the original ones were shot on film) his style emphasized the visual and not the sex.  Aria G. is the worst lez porn actress there is.  She hardly ever does _anything_.  He should sign up super cutie &#8220;Jo&#8221;.  Breasts like that deserve immortality.<br />
AB should get back to his actors and actresses actually having _real_ sex while maintaining the visual overload that is his hallmark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on do you want to play a game? by Hex</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/do-you-want-to-play-a-game.html#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>Hex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1949#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>There is a a discussion on Play the News that would benefit by having Violet Blue enter the fray to clarify things, especially about the content of the BoingBoing blogs and if her relationship with the editor was a factor in the unpublishing. Sex education is sorely lacking and even though I have not searched out the BoingBoing archives for deleted blog entries, seems to me, by perusing this web site, that VB is the Sue Johanson of the Internet. (In case you don't know Sue, she's a way hip 80 year old grandma who hosts the Sunday Night Sex Show, a favourite in Canada since 1996.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a a discussion on Play the News that would benefit by having Violet Blue enter the fray to clarify things, especially about the content of the BoingBoing blogs and if her relationship with the editor was a factor in the unpublishing. Sex education is sorely lacking and even though I have not searched out the BoingBoing archives for deleted blog entries, seems to me, by perusing this web site, that VB is the Sue Johanson of the Internet. (In case you don&#8217;t know Sue, she&#8217;s a way hip 80 year old grandma who hosts the Sunday Night Sex Show, a favourite in Canada since 1996.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on do you want to play a game? by anon</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/do-you-want-to-play-a-game.html#comment-1753</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1949#comment-1753</guid>
		<description>hm.  all i get is a blank page...  i guess that's appropriate in one sense.  ;)  i was hoping that this would be an artfully childish response to an disdainfully childish action.  probably is, but the 64-32-bit flash bridge is acting up again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hm.  all i get is a blank page&#8230;  i guess that&#8217;s appropriate in one sense.  ;)  i was hoping that this would be an artfully childish response to an disdainfully childish action.  probably is, but the 64-32-bit flash bridge is acting up again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on lesbianism and homosexuality are condemned by B.E. Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/lesbianism-and-homosexuality-are-condemned.html#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>B.E. Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1950#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>I'm always hesitant to click the "...read more" links at the bottom of these articles.  Oh, I love your posts for the Guardian.  It's just that I always feel the need to read the snarky comments at the bottom of the page.  And then I feel sad for humanity.  Feh.

Sounds like you had a blast...rock on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m always hesitant to click the &#8220;&#8230;read more&#8221; links at the bottom of these articles.  Oh, I love your posts for the Guardian.  It&#8217;s just that I always feel the need to read the snarky comments at the bottom of the page.  And then I feel sad for humanity.  Feh.</p>
<p>Sounds like you had a blast&#8230;rock on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on do you want to play a game? by Donnie</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/do-you-want-to-play-a-game.html#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1949#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>This is a game no one can win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a game no one can win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on when transparency does not equal erased by MichaelK</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/when-transparency-does-not-equal-erased.html#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1939#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://reversecowgirlblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/quote-of-day-xeni-jardin.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;So much&lt;/a&gt; for Cowgirl's "&lt;a href="http://reversecowgirlblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/all-im-gonna-say.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;all she's gonna say.&lt;/a&gt;"

With bonus use of Coop's "just because" photo. Good grief.

I can't help but wonder if it's sincere or fear of getting rolled off the site themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://reversecowgirlblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/quote-of-day-xeni-jardin.html" rel="nofollow">So much</a> for Cowgirl&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://reversecowgirlblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/all-im-gonna-say.html" rel="nofollow">all she&#8217;s gonna say.</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>With bonus use of Coop&#8217;s &#8220;just because&#8221; photo. Good grief.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but wonder if it&#8217;s sincere or fear of getting rolled off the site themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on do you want to play a game? by Mat Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/do-you-want-to-play-a-game.html#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 10:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1949#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>Do I have to play as the Boing Boing people? Can't I be a good guy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I have to play as the Boing Boing people? Can&#8217;t I be a good guy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on do you want to play a game? by courtney</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/do-you-want-to-play-a-game.html#comment-1748</link>
		<dc:creator>courtney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1949#comment-1748</guid>
		<description>I won!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on we won by Agile Cyborg</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/06/we-won.html#comment-1741</link>
		<dc:creator>Agile Cyborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1948#comment-1741</guid>
		<description>@Mat

This is a direct quote from your earlier post:

'It doesn’t matter what you think of something like marriage'

I simply posted a view with candor not at all intended to cool hot vibes. This site can handle an alternative view, I should think, with little effort.

Equality is cool. I just derive from a rather lonely perspective that marriage is highly over-rated. Nuff said... back to the festivities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mat</p>
<p>This is a direct quote from your earlier post:</p>
<p>&#8216;It doesn’t matter what you think of something like marriage&#8217;</p>
<p>I simply posted a view with candor not at all intended to cool hot vibes. This site can handle an alternative view, I should think, with little effort.</p>
<p>Equality is cool. I just derive from a rather lonely perspective that marriage is highly over-rated. Nuff said&#8230; back to the festivities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
