<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Sex Reads: AdultFriendFinder breach, Ex Machina, libertarian porn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2015/05/sunday-sex-reads-adultfriendfinder-breach-ex-machina-libertarian-porn.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2015/05/sunday-sex-reads-adultfriendfinder-breach-ex-machina-libertarian-porn.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falbert</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2015/05/sunday-sex-reads-adultfriendfinder-breach-ex-machina-libertarian-porn.html/comment-page-1#comment-94271</link>
		<dc:creator>Falbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=23053#comment-94271</guid>
		<description>Edit needed:  in the last article linked to, it should read &quot;... a pair of rogue DEA agents ran a ...&quot;    &quot;Rogue&quot; is also perhaps a bit overstating the case.  &quot;Foolish&quot; or &quot;sleazy&quot; might perhaps be more accurate, from my reading of the linked article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit needed:  in the last article linked to, it should read &#8220;&#8230; a pair of rogue DEA agents ran a &#8230;&#8221;    &#8220;Rogue&#8221; is also perhaps a bit overstating the case.  &#8220;Foolish&#8221; or &#8220;sleazy&#8221; might perhaps be more accurate, from my reading of the linked article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Napis</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2015/05/sunday-sex-reads-adultfriendfinder-breach-ex-machina-libertarian-porn.html/comment-page-1#comment-94270</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie Napis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 22:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=23053#comment-94270</guid>
		<description>Settle down, Elf. How about let&#039;s not presume to tell each other what or what not to call the performers in the video. Your insistence that they must be regarded as &quot;woman-shaped masturbation assistance devices&quot; is more objectifying and dehumanizing than the video is. Your tedious commentary kinda looks like misogyny shabbily disguised as feminism. I mean really, where do you think you&#039;re posting and who are you trying to impress here (apart from yourself)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Settle down, Elf. How about let&#8217;s not presume to tell each other what or what not to call the performers in the video. Your insistence that they must be regarded as &#8220;woman-shaped masturbation assistance devices&#8221; is more objectifying and dehumanizing than the video is. Your tedious commentary kinda looks like misogyny shabbily disguised as feminism. I mean really, where do you think you&#8217;re posting and who are you trying to impress here (apart from yourself)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elf Sternberg</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2015/05/sunday-sex-reads-adultfriendfinder-breach-ex-machina-libertarian-porn.html/comment-page-1#comment-94269</link>
		<dc:creator>Elf Sternberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2015 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=23053#comment-94269</guid>
		<description>That Coco De Mer ad is more embarrassing than sexy; It&#039;s like some bad 1960s-era experiment with editing, no longer cool in an era when digital images can be streamed together so willfully, combined with a lot of skinny, young, white women servicing male fantasies.

Let&#039;s not call them &quot;sexbots,&quot; shall we?  They&#039;re woman-shaped masturbation assistance devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Coco De Mer ad is more embarrassing than sexy; It&#8217;s like some bad 1960s-era experiment with editing, no longer cool in an era when digital images can be streamed together so willfully, combined with a lot of skinny, young, white women servicing male fantasies.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not call them &#8220;sexbots,&#8221; shall we?  They&#8217;re woman-shaped masturbation assistance devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 17:50:28 by W3 Total Cache -->