<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex News: Playboy&#8217;s clueless CEO, boob twerking, more lumbersexuality, Squirt Alert app</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2014/12/sex-news-playboys-clueless-ceo-boob-twerking-more-lumbersexuality-squirt-alert-app.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2014/12/sex-news-playboys-clueless-ceo-boob-twerking-more-lumbersexuality-squirt-alert-app.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2014/12/sex-news-playboys-clueless-ceo-boob-twerking-more-lumbersexuality-squirt-alert-app.html/comment-page-1#comment-93739</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=21364#comment-93739</guid>
		<description>Why do people continue to talk about the &quot;new&quot; UK banned sex acts in porn? This is bad journalism. There is nothing new about this list of banned acts, it is simply applying the list that has applied to R18 videos for many years to also apply to UK produced online porn.

I don&#039;t agree with this banned list at all, if it&#039;s legal to do it should be legal to watch. But the fact remains that this list is NOT new, so please could Tiny Nibbles stop referring to it as such. You highlight bad journalism from others eg, &quot;first&quot; New York sex film festival, so please try to be accurate yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people continue to talk about the &#8220;new&#8221; UK banned sex acts in porn? This is bad journalism. There is nothing new about this list of banned acts, it is simply applying the list that has applied to R18 videos for many years to also apply to UK produced online porn.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t agree with this banned list at all, if it&#8217;s legal to do it should be legal to watch. But the fact remains that this list is NOT new, so please could Tiny Nibbles stop referring to it as such. You highlight bad journalism from others eg, &#8220;first&#8221; New York sex film festival, so please try to be accurate yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 20:15:39 by W3 Total Cache -->