That explanation is so you have a bit of context for what I’m trying to do here, which is to offer erotic entertainment that spans diverse tastes, pornographic contexts, genders and orientations, body sizes, kinks, indies and majors, as well as porn interests, as diverse as I can find. This range includes amateur, indie queer, kink from mild to extreme, couples and romance, rough and edgy, and occasionally conventional porn that can be silly, sexy or trashy — though with conventional porn I try to feature stars I know my visitors like, or European porn. With trashy stuff, which some people really like, I’ll only pick scenes and shoots that feature *everyone* engaged and exhibiting genuine enjoyment (like Magma’s shoot of Sina and her boyfriend). Magma just got picked up by one of my ethical distributors so they’re new to me, but if we decide we don’t like them, I’ll dump them. FWIW in making this post I noted that Magma didn’t have a lot of great shoots to choose from, so I was already doubtful they’d be Eye Candy regulars.

Let me know what you think. I try to appeal to a wide set of tastes without supporting sex-negative crap, and some of those tastes aren’t to my own, and they go in different shaped containers of fantasy and consent for some people… I hope this makes sense.