<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex News: Corporate censorship, in defense of kink, &#8216;why do you hate porn stars&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2014/03/sex-news-corporate-censorship-in-defense-of-kink-why-do-you-hate-porn-stars.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2014/03/sex-news-corporate-censorship-in-defense-of-kink-why-do-you-hate-porn-stars.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2014/03/sex-news-corporate-censorship-in-defense-of-kink-why-do-you-hate-porn-stars.html/comment-page-1#comment-88259</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=19282#comment-88259</guid>
		<description>I think you are being far too hard on Forbes. Consider their demographic: business people who want to be on the cutting edge so long as it does not involve any chance of failure. What were poor Forbes editors to do?  They could hardly entitle their piece, “Darn, We are the Last Ones to the Party – Everyone Else is Already Connected, So to Speak.&quot;  

And I can hardly blame Forbes for not covering these things 10 years ago.  What if all this was just a fad or faced some sort of fellatio failure.  Forbes readers would have been the laughing stock at the water cooler.  I’ll bet the Economist and the Wall Street Journal don’t get around to reporting on teledildonics for at least another 10 years.

I think of it as the trickle down theory of ideas.  They premier on the runway, later step out in the retail outlets, and finally find a happy buyer in the consignment shop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are being far too hard on Forbes. Consider their demographic: business people who want to be on the cutting edge so long as it does not involve any chance of failure. What were poor Forbes editors to do?  They could hardly entitle their piece, “Darn, We are the Last Ones to the Party – Everyone Else is Already Connected, So to Speak.&#8221;  </p>
<p>And I can hardly blame Forbes for not covering these things 10 years ago.  What if all this was just a fad or faced some sort of fellatio failure.  Forbes readers would have been the laughing stock at the water cooler.  I’ll bet the Economist and the Wall Street Journal don’t get around to reporting on teledildonics for at least another 10 years.</p>
<p>I think of it as the trickle down theory of ideas.  They premier on the runway, later step out in the retail outlets, and finally find a happy buyer in the consignment shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2014/03/sex-news-corporate-censorship-in-defense-of-kink-why-do-you-hate-porn-stars.html/comment-page-1#comment-88076</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=19282#comment-88076</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t stop being impressed by Belle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t stop being impressed by Belle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falbert</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2014/03/sex-news-corporate-censorship-in-defense-of-kink-why-do-you-hate-porn-stars.html/comment-page-1#comment-88070</link>
		<dc:creator>Falbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=19282#comment-88070</guid>
		<description>Time to start shaming the Richmond, CA tweeters publicly for wasting time on Twitter, and chasing down &quot;crimes&quot; that aren&#039;t worth the time, or which should even be &quot;crimes&quot; in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to start shaming the Richmond, CA tweeters publicly for wasting time on Twitter, and chasing down &#8220;crimes&#8221; that aren&#8217;t worth the time, or which should even be &#8220;crimes&#8221; in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 19:01:07 by W3 Total Cache -->