Comments on: Sex News: Penal sperm, Google Glass porn, a female porn viewer’s woes http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2013/05/sex-news-penal-sperm-google-glass-porn-a-female-porn-viewers-woes.html Journalist and author Violet Blue's site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more. Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Elf M. Sternberg http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2013/05/sex-news-penal-sperm-google-glass-porn-a-female-porn-viewers-woes.html/comment-page-1#comment-75568 Elf M. Sternberg Sat, 01 Jun 2013 03:36:50 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=17571#comment-75568 Speaking of condoms, does anyone know why all the hypo-allergenic latex condoms have all disappeared off the market? We're back to two choices-- lambskin and latex, neither of which are appropriate for people concerned with practicing safer sex who also have latex allergies. Speaking of condoms, does anyone know why all the hypo-allergenic latex condoms have all disappeared off the market? We’re back to two choices– lambskin and latex, neither of which are appropriate for people concerned with practicing safer sex who also have latex allergies.

]]> By: Farfetch http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2013/05/sex-news-penal-sperm-google-glass-porn-a-female-porn-viewers-woes.html/comment-page-1#comment-75542 Farfetch Fri, 31 May 2013 20:15:14 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=17571#comment-75542 One piece one the anti-porn front that might have passed by unnoticed was a letter published this week in the UK's Guardian signed by 14 lawyers acting with 2 groups - UK Feminista and Object - suggesting shops should stop selling any of what we call "Lads' mags" (i.e. lots of bikinis, boobs and bums and covered nudes but nothing frontal) as well as anything that shows "pornographic" front covers else the staff could sue the shop under the Equality Act 2010 as well as suggesting customers that are "exposed" to this might "suffer". It's the normal sort of nonsense from the Guardian under the guise of censoring the media because these groups don't like the idea of porn so want everyone to suffer, indeed, laughably, they compared selling the magazines (which now are largely covered up when at eye level in the bigger shops so you only see the name of the magazine) to instances of workers being sacked for watching porn on work pcs and a case where a woman in police employment had male colleagues watch porn on TV and put up porn on the walls of the workplace. The #losetheladsmags twitter feed has rolled out the old chestnuts, linking the sale to rape and violence against women http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/may/27/supermarkets-harassment-lads-mags-lawyers Predictably, they have not enabled comments on the article, nothing like preventing the other side having a say when your case is so shaky. One piece one the anti-porn front that might have passed by unnoticed was a letter published this week in the UK’s Guardian signed by 14 lawyers acting with 2 groups – UK Feminista and Object – suggesting shops should stop selling any of what we call “Lads’ mags” (i.e. lots of bikinis, boobs and bums and covered nudes but nothing frontal) as well as anything that shows “pornographic” front covers else the staff could sue the shop under the Equality Act 2010 as well as suggesting customers that are “exposed” to this might “suffer”.

It’s the normal sort of nonsense from the Guardian under the guise of censoring the media because these groups don’t like the idea of porn so want everyone to suffer, indeed, laughably, they compared selling the magazines (which now are largely covered up when at eye level in the bigger shops so you only see the name of the magazine) to instances of workers being sacked for watching porn on work pcs and a case where a woman in police employment had male colleagues watch porn on TV and put up porn on the walls of the workplace.

The #losetheladsmags twitter feed has rolled out the old chestnuts, linking the sale to rape and violence against women

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2013/may/27/supermarkets-harassment-lads-mags-lawyers

Predictably, they have not enabled comments on the article, nothing like preventing the other side having a say when your case is so shaky.

]]>