Comments on: Sex News: Scary handcuffs, BSides, Apple deletes ur email, Geico bestiality http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2013/03/sex-news-scary-handcuffs-bsides-apple-deletes-ur-email-geico-bestiality.html Journalist and author Violet Blue's site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more. Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: tejanojim http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2013/03/sex-news-scary-handcuffs-bsides-apple-deletes-ur-email-geico-bestiality.html/comment-page-1#comment-69705 tejanojim Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:46:22 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=17099#comment-69705 Re: french lingerie ads. I get the amusing, but not really the unsettling. I love how expressive their nipples are, like the nose of a small mammal. Re: french lingerie ads. I get the amusing, but not really the unsettling. I love how expressive their nipples are, like the nose of a small mammal.

]]> By: Mario http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2013/03/sex-news-scary-handcuffs-bsides-apple-deletes-ur-email-geico-bestiality.html/comment-page-1#comment-69613 Mario Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:55:18 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=17099#comment-69613 I'm skeptical about the iCloud emails being deleted because they contain the phrase "barely legal teens," or any other particular phrase. I just sent an email from my @me.com account to my @gmail.com account, with that specific phrase, and had no problem. I'm including the raw message text below (with personal information stripped out) and inviting others to try to duplicate the issue. Delivered-To: xxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.179.xxxs with SMTP id dj1csp83977wjc; Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:44:30 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.68.31.130 with SMTP id a2mr31638623pbi.213.1362444269336; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:44:29 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from nk11p04mm-asmtp001.mac.com (nk11p04mm-asmtpout001.mac.com. [17.158.236.xxx]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id tm6si23871338pbc.175.2013.03.04.16.44.28; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:44:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of xxxxxxx@me.com designates 17.158.236.xxx as permitted sender) client-ip=17.158.236.xxx; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of xxxxxxx@me.com designates 17.158.236.xxx as permitted sender) smtp.mail=xxxxxxx@me.com Received: from [192.168.0.100] (unknown [50.108.132.xxx]) by nk11p04mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-26.01(7.0.4.26.0) 64bit (built Jul 13 2012)) with ESMTPSA id for xxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:44:09 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-03-04_03:2013-03-04,2013-03-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=1 spamscore=1 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=4 adultscore=98 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1303040260 From: Mario xxxxx Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Is it true? Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:43:08 -0500 Message-id: To: Mario xxxxx MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Can you send an email with the phrase barely legal teens and not have it = deleted?= I’m skeptical about the iCloud emails being deleted because they contain the phrase “barely legal teens,” or any other particular phrase. I just sent an email from my @me.com account to my @gmail.com account, with that specific phrase, and had no problem. I’m including the raw message text below (with personal information stripped out) and inviting others to try to duplicate the issue.

Delivered-To: xxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.179.xxxs with SMTP id dj1csp83977wjc;
Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:44:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.68.31.130 with SMTP id a2mr31638623pbi.213.1362444269336;
Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path:
Received: from nk11p04mm-asmtp001.mac.com (nk11p04mm-asmtpout001.mac.com. [17.158.236.xxx])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id tm6si23871338pbc.175.2013.03.04.16.44.28;
Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:44:29 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of xxxxxxx@me.com designates 17.158.236.xxx as permitted sender) client-ip=17.158.236.xxx;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=pass (google.com: domain of xxxxxxx@me.com designates 17.158.236.xxx as permitted sender) smtp.mail=xxxxxxx@me.com
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (unknown [50.108.132.xxx])
by nk11p04mm-asmtp001.mac.com
(Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-26.01(7.0.4.26.0) 64bit (built Jul
13 2012)) with ESMTPSA id for
xxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:44:09 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure
engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8327,1.0.431,0.0.0000
definitions=2013-03-04_03:2013-03-04,2013-03-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=1 spamscore=1
ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=4 adultscore=98
classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001
definitions=main-1303040260
From: Mario xxxxx
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Is it true?
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:43:08 -0500
Message-id:
To: Mario xxxxx
MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)

Can you send an email with the phrase barely legal teens and not have it =
deleted?=

]]> By: Farfetch http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2013/03/sex-news-scary-handcuffs-bsides-apple-deletes-ur-email-geico-bestiality.html/comment-page-1#comment-69609 Farfetch Mon, 04 Mar 2013 22:00:27 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=17099#comment-69609 We had the "ban porn" debate highlighted in the UK at the weekend and in the press today following a debate at the Bath Literature Festival, with all the old clichés coming out about protecting women, how porn exploits all the performers and blaming porn for all of society's ills. For a "debate" it seemed rather one sided going by the reporting, effectively "we agree porn is evil but let's debate if it should be banned or not". There's a link here: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/features/bath-literature-festival-protect-young-women-with-a-ban-on-pornography-panel-hears-8518493.html We had the “ban porn” debate highlighted in the UK at the weekend and in the press today following a debate at the Bath Literature Festival, with all the old clichés coming out about protecting women, how porn exploits all the performers and blaming porn for all of society’s ills. For a “debate” it seemed rather one sided going by the reporting, effectively “we agree porn is evil but let’s debate if it should be banned or not”.

There’s a link here:

http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/features/bath-literature-festival-protect-young-women-with-a-ban-on-pornography-panel-hears-8518493.html

]]>