<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex News: NASA&#8217;s crush object, geek sex fallacies, dating privacy online, sex in a WalMart</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/08/sex-news-nasas-crush-object-geek-sex-fallacies-dating-privacy-online-sex-in-a-walmart.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/08/sex-news-nasas-crush-object-geek-sex-fallacies-dating-privacy-online-sex-in-a-walmart.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridget</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/08/sex-news-nasas-crush-object-geek-sex-fallacies-dating-privacy-online-sex-in-a-walmart.html/comment-page-1#comment-36913</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 04:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=15900#comment-36913</guid>
		<description>The article about the child pornography ring sent chills down my spine. A large distributor of child porn was also arrested in Japan earlier this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article about the child pornography ring sent chills down my spine. A large distributor of child porn was also arrested in Japan earlier this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elf M. Sternberg</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/08/sex-news-nasas-crush-object-geek-sex-fallacies-dating-privacy-online-sex-in-a-walmart.html/comment-page-1#comment-36841</link>
		<dc:creator>Elf M. Sternberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=15900#comment-36841</guid>
		<description>Jenna&#039;s also wrong.  When you&#039;re rich and smart, you want Democrats in office.  Because at the end of every Republican administration since Nixon, there are *fewer* rich people.  Yeah, they&#039;re wealthier.  There are also fewer of them.  

I suspect Ms. Jenna may think she&#039;s rich, but she&#039;s hardly in the 1%.  For those in the top 90-99%, staying &quot;rich&quot; means electing Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jenna&#8217;s also wrong.  When you&#8217;re rich and smart, you want Democrats in office.  Because at the end of every Republican administration since Nixon, there are *fewer* rich people.  Yeah, they&#8217;re wealthier.  There are also fewer of them.  </p>
<p>I suspect Ms. Jenna may think she&#8217;s rich, but she&#8217;s hardly in the 1%.  For those in the top 90-99%, staying &#8220;rich&#8221; means electing Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiffany</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/08/sex-news-nasas-crush-object-geek-sex-fallacies-dating-privacy-online-sex-in-a-walmart.html/comment-page-1#comment-36838</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiffany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=15900#comment-36838</guid>
		<description>The Jenna Jameson thing just confuses me... it seems like &quot;when you&#039;re rich, you want a Republican in office&quot; *has* to be sarcastic, because the flip-side of that is so fucking obvious. But maybe she&#039;s serious, in which case... bleh. Not cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jenna Jameson thing just confuses me&#8230; it seems like &#8220;when you&#8217;re rich, you want a Republican in office&#8221; *has* to be sarcastic, because the flip-side of that is so fucking obvious. But maybe she&#8217;s serious, in which case&#8230; bleh. Not cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 18:17:56 by W3 Total Cache -->