<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eye Candy: Met Art debuts upscale hardcore site Sex Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/04/eye-candy-met-art-debuts-upscale-hardcore-site-sex-art.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/04/eye-candy-met-art-debuts-upscale-hardcore-site-sex-art.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iamcuriousblue</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/04/eye-candy-met-art-debuts-upscale-hardcore-site-sex-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-26095</link>
		<dc:creator>Iamcuriousblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 06:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=14886#comment-26095</guid>
		<description>I find Sex Art pretty disappointing, overall. I *really* like the thought of the kind of beauties featured on Met-Art turning out for some more racy content, but unfortunately that&#039;s not what Sex Art features, at least video-wise. Their videos, rather, are all LA porn models and, so far, none of the European girls you&#039;d see on Met-Art. So, OK, but X-Art and Joymii still turn out some really nice content, often with LA performers. On that point, still disappointing. I admit to finding a few pirated Sexart videos to see if the site was worth subscribing to - the videos I saw are very much in the X-Art/Joymii vein, but with *much* shorter sex scenes. Usually the video is at least five minutes of stripping and posing and five or less minute highlights of actual sex. It is possible to edit together a very short sex scene that hits all the right notes (the &quot;Shai&quot; porn ads from a few years ago are a good example), but these videos don&#039;t manage that. (On the upside, they have some videos with the lovely Charlotte Stokely, somebody I never get tired of seeing.) OK, some of the photo content is nice and features actual Met-Art models, but it&#039;s really video content that I judge a site on.

The *real* claimant to the mantle of &quot;Met-Art with sex&quot; would be Wowgirls and related sites, which really do shoot some of the same models as Met-Art, such as Beata. Some of their video content is nothing short of amazing. In fact, one of their recent videos, &quot;First Girl-Girl Date&quot; is a serious contender for my favorite piece of pornography ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Sex Art pretty disappointing, overall. I *really* like the thought of the kind of beauties featured on Met-Art turning out for some more racy content, but unfortunately that&#8217;s not what Sex Art features, at least video-wise. Their videos, rather, are all LA porn models and, so far, none of the European girls you&#8217;d see on Met-Art. So, OK, but X-Art and Joymii still turn out some really nice content, often with LA performers. On that point, still disappointing. I admit to finding a few pirated Sexart videos to see if the site was worth subscribing to &#8211; the videos I saw are very much in the X-Art/Joymii vein, but with *much* shorter sex scenes. Usually the video is at least five minutes of stripping and posing and five or less minute highlights of actual sex. It is possible to edit together a very short sex scene that hits all the right notes (the &#8220;Shai&#8221; porn ads from a few years ago are a good example), but these videos don&#8217;t manage that. (On the upside, they have some videos with the lovely Charlotte Stokely, somebody I never get tired of seeing.) OK, some of the photo content is nice and features actual Met-Art models, but it&#8217;s really video content that I judge a site on.</p>
<p>The *real* claimant to the mantle of &#8220;Met-Art with sex&#8221; would be Wowgirls and related sites, which really do shoot some of the same models as Met-Art, such as Beata. Some of their video content is nothing short of amazing. In fact, one of their recent videos, &#8220;First Girl-Girl Date&#8221; is a serious contender for my favorite piece of pornography ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Mod</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/04/eye-candy-met-art-debuts-upscale-hardcore-site-sex-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-25092</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Mod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 01:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=14886#comment-25092</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very well shot although the music makes me feel like I&#039;m watching the trailer to Inception. It may be to early to start looking for people of color of a high production value website I will keep an eye out in hopes of being pleasantly surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very well shot although the music makes me feel like I&#8217;m watching the trailer to Inception. It may be to early to start looking for people of color of a high production value website I will keep an eye out in hopes of being pleasantly surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: violet blue</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/04/eye-candy-met-art-debuts-upscale-hardcore-site-sex-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-25091</link>
		<dc:creator>violet blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=14886#comment-25091</guid>
		<description>&gt; Overpriced, overhyped, completely standardized with only the most limited options. 

OMG LOL (also ROFL!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Overpriced, overhyped, completely standardized with only the most limited options. </p>
<p>OMG LOL (also ROFL!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/04/eye-candy-met-art-debuts-upscale-hardcore-site-sex-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-25090</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 22:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=14886#comment-25090</guid>
		<description>Hmm. Porn made by apple... Overpriced, overhyped, completely standardized with only the most limited options. Yup, that&#039;s what I want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. Porn made by apple&#8230; Overpriced, overhyped, completely standardized with only the most limited options. Yup, that&#8217;s what I want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falbert</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/04/eye-candy-met-art-debuts-upscale-hardcore-site-sex-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-25086</link>
		<dc:creator>Falbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=14886#comment-25086</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads&#039; up about these photo sets.  Delicious and delightful, and much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads&#8217; up about these photo sets.  Delicious and delightful, and much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilyn</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2012/04/eye-candy-met-art-debuts-upscale-hardcore-site-sex-art.html/comment-page-1#comment-25081</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 07:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=14886#comment-25081</guid>
		<description>The guy in the first two shoots is only identified as &quot;Tobias A.&quot; Cursory googling reveals him nowhere else. Damn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy in the first two shoots is only identified as &#8220;Tobias A.&#8221; Cursory googling reveals him nowhere else. Damn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 19:22:12 by W3 Total Cache -->