Comments on: California School Claims Its Own Yearbook is Child Porn

By: Bill Connors

Bill Connors — Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:52:06 +0000

Adults should also say “child nudity” when it is so, and not “child abuse photos”. There is a hysteria that all photos of nude kids are abusive. I have a nude photo of myself as a toddler. Apparently when I look at it, I am a victim because it constitutes a crime scene, and I am abused. This attitude is victimizing families who are utterly innocent of anything. This bigoted view of nudity is sexual bullying at its worse.

By: jjp108

jjp108 — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 23:07:38 +0000

So anyway – does “Big Bear Sheriff’s Station” sound like gay porn to you, too?

By: MichiganChet

MichiganChet — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 17:02:14 +0000

Sadly, i don’t think you are ‘jumping to conclusions’ when you extrapolate to our culture from this dance of the dingbats. It indicates to me how neurotic, schizoid, afraid of sex and basically infantile many many many of us in this great land have become. It dramatically illustrates the simultaneous sexing up of children’s culture, while at the same time infantilization of legitimate adult culture which necessarily includes a healthy amount of sex in it (as your blog demonstrates. Pity

By: Dangerous Lilly

Dangerous Lilly — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 13:20:20 +0000

So kids have found more tech-savvy ways of appeasing their hormones (sexting) and some Yearbook editor is dumb enough to either have included that photo knowing what was in it, or not looked close enough (dumb meaning they had to have known they’d get in trouble) and suddenly it’s “child pornography”. WTF is right.
If these kids were just a few years older I’d be lechering over the photo. But for now, the girl at least gets to live on in infamy as “that chick who’s thong was on view while her date fingerbanged her”.

By: Rob

Rob — Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:55:51 +0000

When I looked at the photo I wondered where the dress is, I see a corset and panties. Silver panties whould have been a getter match