<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pseudoscience and Problems in National Geographic&#8217;s &#8220;Sex Addiction&#8221; Segment of &#8220;Taboo&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html/comment-page-1#comment-13545</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=9734#comment-13545</guid>
		<description>On behalf of Robert Weiss, the Founding Director of The Sexual Recovery Institute, we thank you for your comments and perspective.  Rob notes that most sexual addiction treatment/therapy is not religious-based and strives to be non-judgmental.  Please visit his website robertweissmsw.com for more information.  Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On behalf of Robert Weiss, the Founding Director of The Sexual Recovery Institute, we thank you for your comments and perspective.  Rob notes that most sexual addiction treatment/therapy is not religious-based and strives to be non-judgmental.  Please visit his website robertweissmsw.com for more information.  Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessi Fischer</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html/comment-page-1#comment-13440</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessi Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 22:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=9734#comment-13440</guid>
		<description>Marissa,

The reason I wanted to go over dopamine in that way is because people pushing the sex addiction model frame dopamine as *the* reward we&#039;re getting when an orgasm happens instead of discussing the complexity and gaps in scientific knowledge. And when it comes to sex, dopamine has a very specific role in prepping for body for excitation but I haven&#039;t found anything to suggest that dopamine is released during orgasm itself. (Honestly, we still don&#039;t completely understand why the hell orgasms feel so good. I highly, highly recommend reading &quot;The Science of Orgasm&quot; if you want to get an in-depth look at what we do know.).

In no way am I writing off compulsive behaviors. In fact, I&#039;m arguing that all compulsive behaviors should be grouped together because of the common dopamine involvement, whether or not they involve sex as the object of compulsion. (Relevant Snip: &quot;While I completely disagree with the “sex addiction” concept, I do believe anxiety will cause people to engage in a variety of compulsive behaviors. But it could just as easily be compulsively polishing a rifle as it could be compulsive rest stop blow jobs. The issue is neither the gun nor the cock; the issue is anxiety.&quot;)

I hope this makes sense! I&#039;d also really like to check out your paper if you&#039;re ok with sharing it. You can email me at thesexademic AT gmail

Cheers!

-Jessi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marissa,</p>
<p>The reason I wanted to go over dopamine in that way is because people pushing the sex addiction model frame dopamine as *the* reward we&#8217;re getting when an orgasm happens instead of discussing the complexity and gaps in scientific knowledge. And when it comes to sex, dopamine has a very specific role in prepping for body for excitation but I haven&#8217;t found anything to suggest that dopamine is released during orgasm itself. (Honestly, we still don&#8217;t completely understand why the hell orgasms feel so good. I highly, highly recommend reading &#8220;The Science of Orgasm&#8221; if you want to get an in-depth look at what we do know.).</p>
<p>In no way am I writing off compulsive behaviors. In fact, I&#8217;m arguing that all compulsive behaviors should be grouped together because of the common dopamine involvement, whether or not they involve sex as the object of compulsion. (Relevant Snip: &#8220;While I completely disagree with the “sex addiction” concept, I do believe anxiety will cause people to engage in a variety of compulsive behaviors. But it could just as easily be compulsively polishing a rifle as it could be compulsive rest stop blow jobs. The issue is neither the gun nor the cock; the issue is anxiety.&#8221;)</p>
<p>I hope this makes sense! I&#8217;d also really like to check out your paper if you&#8217;re ok with sharing it. You can email me at thesexademic AT gmail</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>-Jessi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marissa</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html/comment-page-1#comment-13400</link>
		<dc:creator>Marissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 15:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=9734#comment-13400</guid>
		<description>I am only a humble senior psych undergraduate taking a seminar on Addiction that just wrote a 10 page research paper on so-called sex addiction with a specific focus on porn - and my paper came to the same basic conclusions that you have. And the article you linked to and excerpted from is brilliant in many ways. But the excerpts you chose do seem - to the best of my knowledge - not to make any sense whatsoever. The motivation and the reward are the same thing! Your brain does use dopamine to reward you, and that reward is what motivates you to repeat the behavior! Dopamine is released due to substance abuse and dependence in extremely high amounts, along with other neurotransmitters.
 
So the release of dopamine certainly can correspond with compulsive behaviors (as the article states) that may be unhealthy to the individual. This is evident in a wide range of behaviors like sex and porn that are usually associated with increased mental health. People may find that they continue to perform these behaviors despite consequences and that it is beyond their control - the hallmark of addictive behaviors. Consequences are usually related to harming important relationships in their life due to such time consuming use, which is rare and not to be confused with just &quot;watching porn because porn is inherently bad.&quot; 

But sex and porn are not associated with neurobiological changes in the brain that correspond with the withdrawal that perpetuates use in substance dependent individuals. See, most addicted individuals don&#039;t continue to use to gain pleasure, they do it relieve themselves of the pain they feel due to the changes the drug has made in the brain. 

Obviously anyone should and I&#039;m sure will take what I&#039;m saying with a grain of salt, as I clearly don&#039;t have expert science chops. But spending three months learning about addiction has given me a good base of knowledge surrounding these areas. I think that individuals who write off sexually healthy individuals who happen to be very sexually active as sex addicts and mentally unstable are obviously in the wrong. But writing off the potential existence of compulsive behaviors that can cause harm in a person&#039;s life just for the sake of being sex positive isn&#039;t good either, and I see a lot of that on blogs like these. I just want everyone to do all the research with an open mind, because too much of even a wonderfully healthy and natural thing can certainly become a bad thing. 

Yikes, holy long comment batman!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am only a humble senior psych undergraduate taking a seminar on Addiction that just wrote a 10 page research paper on so-called sex addiction with a specific focus on porn &#8211; and my paper came to the same basic conclusions that you have. And the article you linked to and excerpted from is brilliant in many ways. But the excerpts you chose do seem &#8211; to the best of my knowledge &#8211; not to make any sense whatsoever. The motivation and the reward are the same thing! Your brain does use dopamine to reward you, and that reward is what motivates you to repeat the behavior! Dopamine is released due to substance abuse and dependence in extremely high amounts, along with other neurotransmitters.</p>
<p>So the release of dopamine certainly can correspond with compulsive behaviors (as the article states) that may be unhealthy to the individual. This is evident in a wide range of behaviors like sex and porn that are usually associated with increased mental health. People may find that they continue to perform these behaviors despite consequences and that it is beyond their control &#8211; the hallmark of addictive behaviors. Consequences are usually related to harming important relationships in their life due to such time consuming use, which is rare and not to be confused with just &#8220;watching porn because porn is inherently bad.&#8221; </p>
<p>But sex and porn are not associated with neurobiological changes in the brain that correspond with the withdrawal that perpetuates use in substance dependent individuals. See, most addicted individuals don&#8217;t continue to use to gain pleasure, they do it relieve themselves of the pain they feel due to the changes the drug has made in the brain. </p>
<p>Obviously anyone should and I&#8217;m sure will take what I&#8217;m saying with a grain of salt, as I clearly don&#8217;t have expert science chops. But spending three months learning about addiction has given me a good base of knowledge surrounding these areas. I think that individuals who write off sexually healthy individuals who happen to be very sexually active as sex addicts and mentally unstable are obviously in the wrong. But writing off the potential existence of compulsive behaviors that can cause harm in a person&#8217;s life just for the sake of being sex positive isn&#8217;t good either, and I see a lot of that on blogs like these. I just want everyone to do all the research with an open mind, because too much of even a wonderfully healthy and natural thing can certainly become a bad thing. </p>
<p>Yikes, holy long comment batman!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Kramer Bussel</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html/comment-page-1#comment-13394</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Kramer Bussel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 21:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=9734#comment-13394</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to say I love this image used to accompany this post - I&#039;m focusing on that at the moment because it&#039;s so hot and I can&#039;t deal with the multitudes of porn-blaming right this second, though great post and great debunking. I feel like every time I turn around porn is being blamed for something, as if people have no agency whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to say I love this image used to accompany this post &#8211; I&#8217;m focusing on that at the moment because it&#8217;s so hot and I can&#8217;t deal with the multitudes of porn-blaming right this second, though great post and great debunking. I feel like every time I turn around porn is being blamed for something, as if people have no agency whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html/comment-page-1#comment-13393</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 20:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=9734#comment-13393</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine is working on this project. It&#039;s a much smaller production team than you think, and I agree with AnthonyA. While I hate the mistake (I was unaware of this aspect of it before), it doesn&#039;t mean that they&#039;re maliciously propagating these lies. The pseudoscience of the &quot;sex addiction&quot; meme (because that&#039;s what it is) is far more prevalent and sells better than the truth. They were probably suckered in and didn&#039;t know there was an issue, hence failed to do proper research due to time constraints. I will also not be boycotting them, but will intead write them a very strongly worded letter that will certainly ruin their breakfast or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine is working on this project. It&#8217;s a much smaller production team than you think, and I agree with AnthonyA. While I hate the mistake (I was unaware of this aspect of it before), it doesn&#8217;t mean that they&#8217;re maliciously propagating these lies. The pseudoscience of the &#8220;sex addiction&#8221; meme (because that&#8217;s what it is) is far more prevalent and sells better than the truth. They were probably suckered in and didn&#8217;t know there was an issue, hence failed to do proper research due to time constraints. I will also not be boycotting them, but will intead write them a very strongly worded letter that will certainly ruin their breakfast or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html/comment-page-1#comment-13391</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=9734#comment-13391</guid>
		<description>Earlier this week before reading this much needed criticism of NatGeo&#039;s new Taboo series, I was horrified by the tone of their upcoming doc on Sexual Identity. I have seen Loren Cameron speak on many occasions about his transsexual identity and I admire and respect his choice to share details about his life as a FTM as a means of demystifying trans issues. The tone of this doc, however, uses an overly dramatic  narrator who frames Loren and the other trans men in the film as nothing more than a &quot;freaks&quot; for &quot;normal&quot; viewers to gawk at. I was hoping NatGeo would develop on their assertion that TS/TG identity makes people frightened by having a larger discussion about heteronormative understandings of men and women, but they did not. 

I am also &quot;more than deeply disappointed with NatGeo.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week before reading this much needed criticism of NatGeo&#8217;s new Taboo series, I was horrified by the tone of their upcoming doc on Sexual Identity. I have seen Loren Cameron speak on many occasions about his transsexual identity and I admire and respect his choice to share details about his life as a FTM as a means of demystifying trans issues. The tone of this doc, however, uses an overly dramatic  narrator who frames Loren and the other trans men in the film as nothing more than a &#8220;freaks&#8221; for &#8220;normal&#8221; viewers to gawk at. I was hoping NatGeo would develop on their assertion that TS/TG identity makes people frightened by having a larger discussion about heteronormative understandings of men and women, but they did not. </p>
<p>I am also &#8220;more than deeply disappointed with NatGeo.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnthonyA</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html/comment-page-1#comment-13390</link>
		<dc:creator>AnthonyA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 14:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=9734#comment-13390</guid>
		<description>&quot;Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to simple laziness.&quot;

I suspect this is the real cause of errors in NatGeo&#039;s upcoming show.  Not properly doing their research.  While I will continue to respect the work of the Society so long as they don&#039;t make a habit of this, every organization, as it grows larger, is bound to have some incompetents creep in, as it becomes more difficult to monitor all the activities of all the members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to simple laziness.&#8221;</p>
<p>I suspect this is the real cause of errors in NatGeo&#8217;s upcoming show.  Not properly doing their research.  While I will continue to respect the work of the Society so long as they don&#8217;t make a habit of this, every organization, as it grows larger, is bound to have some incompetents creep in, as it becomes more difficult to monitor all the activities of all the members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laisa</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html/comment-page-1#comment-13387</link>
		<dc:creator>laisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 03:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=9734#comment-13387</guid>
		<description>This was great, the articles you linked were brilliant! thanks =]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was great, the articles you linked were brilliant! thanks =]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maduceone</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/pseudoscience-and-problems-in-national-geographics-sex-addiction-segment-of-taboo.html/comment-page-1#comment-13386</link>
		<dc:creator>maduceone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 03:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=9734#comment-13386</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t quite understand why networks like NatGeo continue to perpetrate false information about sex during a time when actual research about sex is available. I can only assume that they are pressured by their sponsors/advertisers who, in turn, are afraid of some sort of &quot;Christian&quot; backlash. The anti-porn people mystify me. When there are so many real problems in the world, including poverty, disease and violence, why would someone attack a basically harmless fantasy like porn? I gotta say, however, that the more noise these guys make about how dangerous it is, especially when there&#039;s nothing to back it up, the more it will attract the curious among us. In the case of NatGeo, making false claims will only tend to discredit the rest of their programming. Perhaps, to be &quot;fair and balanced&quot;, NatGeo should offer an alternative view, or are they just plain afraid to do so? Maybe we should consider banning food shows for fear that people who watch them will be driven to overeating and end up being morbidly obese with all those attendant problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t quite understand why networks like NatGeo continue to perpetrate false information about sex during a time when actual research about sex is available. I can only assume that they are pressured by their sponsors/advertisers who, in turn, are afraid of some sort of &#8220;Christian&#8221; backlash. The anti-porn people mystify me. When there are so many real problems in the world, including poverty, disease and violence, why would someone attack a basically harmless fantasy like porn? I gotta say, however, that the more noise these guys make about how dangerous it is, especially when there&#8217;s nothing to back it up, the more it will attract the curious among us. In the case of NatGeo, making false claims will only tend to discredit the rest of their programming. Perhaps, to be &#8220;fair and balanced&#8221;, NatGeo should offer an alternative view, or are they just plain afraid to do so? Maybe we should consider banning food shows for fear that people who watch them will be driven to overeating and end up being morbidly obese with all those attendant problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 18:00:25 by W3 Total Cache -->