<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bling For Your Thing: Is Pejazzling a Pro-Vajazzling PR Hoax?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conn</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/comment-page-1#comment-22668</link>
		<dc:creator>Conn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 07:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=10300#comment-22668</guid>
		<description>Honestly, if people wanna hot glue a diamond to their dick then good on em! Can&#039;t say its for me, but everyone has their own little turn ons! On http://www.guyspy.com you can connect with guys with every fascination!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, if people wanna hot glue a diamond to their dick then good on em! Can&#8217;t say its for me, but everyone has their own little turn ons! On <a href="http://www.guyspy.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.guyspy.com</a> you can connect with guys with every fascination!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srednivashtar</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/comment-page-1#comment-13679</link>
		<dc:creator>Srednivashtar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 12:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=10300#comment-13679</guid>
		<description>...also, yes. This &quot;pejazzling&quot; is clearly a complete load. Anatomically impossible (or, at least, impractical)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;also, yes. This &#8220;pejazzling&#8221; is clearly a complete load. Anatomically impossible (or, at least, impractical)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srednivashtar</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/comment-page-1#comment-13678</link>
		<dc:creator>Srednivashtar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 11:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=10300#comment-13678</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just exciting to hear someone pointing out the difference between &quot;vulva&quot; and &quot;vagina&quot;. The use of the word &quot;vagina&quot; to refer to any and all parts of the female pubic region is a pet peeve of mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just exciting to hear someone pointing out the difference between &#8220;vulva&#8221; and &#8220;vagina&#8221;. The use of the word &#8220;vagina&#8221; to refer to any and all parts of the female pubic region is a pet peeve of mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/comment-page-1#comment-13666</link>
		<dc:creator>Lea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 05:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=10300#comment-13666</guid>
		<description>In light of your as-always nicely-detailed anatomical analyses ... I&#039;m thinking that the above-pictured photoshoot would have been quite interesting _^^_</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In light of your as-always nicely-detailed anatomical analyses &#8230; I&#8217;m thinking that the above-pictured photoshoot would have been quite interesting _^^_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/comment-page-1#comment-13659</link>
		<dc:creator>L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 16:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=10300#comment-13659</guid>
		<description>From somebody in the UK it is widely regarded that anything from the Daily Mail be taken with a liberal pinch of salt. It&#039;s in no way representive of any social or political scene in the UK, just mad hyperbole, sensationalism and scandal at anything that may differ from their ridiculously rigid views of what Britian should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From somebody in the UK it is widely regarded that anything from the Daily Mail be taken with a liberal pinch of salt. It&#8217;s in no way representive of any social or political scene in the UK, just mad hyperbole, sensationalism and scandal at anything that may differ from their ridiculously rigid views of what Britian should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shaggyheid</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/comment-page-1#comment-13636</link>
		<dc:creator>shaggyheid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 21:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=10300#comment-13636</guid>
		<description>I like this site for a different (SF) perspective on sex/sexuality so it&#039;s weird to read you following Daily Mail rhetoric. In the UK, vajazzling was just another reason to laugh at how tacky people from Essex can be (a trope since at least the 1980s but repopularised by the cringey staged &#039;reality&#039; show &#039;The Only Way is Essex&#039;). Everyone here knows the Mail is stuck in the 50s but just happens to feature images/lurid descriptions of the things it disapproves of. If you were in any doubt see this article about the Labour Party leader&#039;s recent wedding - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1391433/Ed-Miliband-Justine-Thornton-wed-civil-ceremony.html - seriously! As we say here when folk &#039;square up&#039; for a fight - &quot;leave it, they&#039;re not worth it!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this site for a different (SF) perspective on sex/sexuality so it&#8217;s weird to read you following Daily Mail rhetoric. In the UK, vajazzling was just another reason to laugh at how tacky people from Essex can be (a trope since at least the 1980s but repopularised by the cringey staged &#8216;reality&#8217; show &#8216;The Only Way is Essex&#8217;). Everyone here knows the Mail is stuck in the 50s but just happens to feature images/lurid descriptions of the things it disapproves of. If you were in any doubt see this article about the Labour Party leader&#8217;s recent wedding &#8211; <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1391433/Ed-Miliband-Justine-Thornton-wed-civil-ceremony.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1391433/Ed-Miliband-Justine-Thornton-wed-civil-ceremony.html</a> &#8211; seriously! As we say here when folk &#8216;square up&#8217; for a fight &#8211; &#8220;leave it, they&#8217;re not worth it!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Falbert</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/comment-page-1#comment-13634</link>
		<dc:creator>Falbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 20:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=10300#comment-13634</guid>
		<description>] &quot;That would, quite frankly, be a heck of a dom/sub scene...&quot;  (above)

I can well imagine a scene where some fellow has a short strap of a non-flexible material super-glued (cyanoacrylate glue) to his penis while soft, preventing a non-painful erection.

Dommes out there, just a thought - remember, safety first, and you can&#039;t wield that whip if you&#039;ve glued your own fingers together!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>] &#8220;That would, quite frankly, be a heck of a dom/sub scene&#8230;&#8221;  (above)</p>
<p>I can well imagine a scene where some fellow has a short strap of a non-flexible material super-glued (cyanoacrylate glue) to his penis while soft, preventing a non-painful erection.</p>
<p>Dommes out there, just a thought &#8211; remember, safety first, and you can&#8217;t wield that whip if you&#8217;ve glued your own fingers together!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sue</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/comment-page-1#comment-13631</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 15:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=10300#comment-13631</guid>
		<description>Oh, I so enjoy your voice, Thomas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I so enjoy your voice, Thomas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megan</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/comment-page-1#comment-13630</link>
		<dc:creator>megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 13:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=10300#comment-13630</guid>
		<description>Also, swarovski crystals can cut you if you run afoul of an edge. Who wants to run the risk of cutting and tearing just to sparkle in low lighting? It&#039;s not as thought bedazzling anything enhances the sexual stimulation of said item... not even diamonds are in themselves arousing to women as a general rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, swarovski crystals can cut you if you run afoul of an edge. Who wants to run the risk of cutting and tearing just to sparkle in low lighting? It&#8217;s not as thought bedazzling anything enhances the sexual stimulation of said item&#8230; not even diamonds are in themselves arousing to women as a general rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/05/is-pejazzling-a-pro-vajazzling-pr-hoax.html/comment-page-1#comment-13629</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 11:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=10300#comment-13629</guid>
		<description>Thomas, all I can say is that Nikki is right; if you and Violet keep insisting on reading the Daily Mail, you will naturally be subjected to the very lowest of sensationalist, reactionary, C/c-onservative journalism that the UK has to offer. You&#039;re obviously both masochists :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas, all I can say is that Nikki is right; if you and Violet keep insisting on reading the Daily Mail, you will naturally be subjected to the very lowest of sensationalist, reactionary, C/c-onservative journalism that the UK has to offer. You&#8217;re obviously both masochists :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 18:05:27 by W3 Total Cache -->