<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Tribute to Chloé des Lysses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/02/a-tribute-to-chloe-des-lysses.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/02/a-tribute-to-chloe-des-lysses.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MC</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/02/a-tribute-to-chloe-des-lysses.html/comment-page-1#comment-21615</link>
		<dc:creator>MC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=8209#comment-21615</guid>
		<description>Regarding Dahmane (and Chloë), may be old news (post is from 2007, referring to 2005), but there you go:
&quot;Now the story behind the pix : Dahmane the talentless sleazeball who took the pix you&#039;re fond of has a LOOONG reputation of degrading his models on the set, not paying them, publishing the pix in mags without the models being informed of this or getting their cut, etc etc.

Since Chloë was much better-looking than any other model he worked with previously, he made sure she would be his cash-cow.
He earnt &amp; still makes a nice cash on Chloë&#039;s pix, making two books, countless publications, plus $ilver prints sold to rich fat old guys from the 50000 images (incl. scat) he has of her .
The funny part? Chloë NEVER made a cent on this stuff whereas Dahmane owns two flats in Paris with the products of &quot;his&quot; (ahem) efforts.

As we speak Chloë des Lysses is broke, on welfare, almost homeless, legally harassed by her ex-husband whereas Dahmane is rich and has become the official snapper for one the French industrial mogul. She&#039;s considered a whore by the judges therefore she&#039;ll never ever win in courthouse : she&#039;s been denied any control over what they did TOGETHER by the French justice (i.e. she&#039;ll never make a buck on her pix) and she&#039;s been sentenced to pay her ex-husband taxes for the time they were together. Neat, huh?&quot;

Source: http://www.avmaniacs.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31600</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Dahmane (and Chloë), may be old news (post is from 2007, referring to 2005), but there you go:<br />
&#8220;Now the story behind the pix : Dahmane the talentless sleazeball who took the pix you&#8217;re fond of has a LOOONG reputation of degrading his models on the set, not paying them, publishing the pix in mags without the models being informed of this or getting their cut, etc etc.</p>
<p>Since Chloë was much better-looking than any other model he worked with previously, he made sure she would be his cash-cow.<br />
He earnt &amp; still makes a nice cash on Chloë&#8217;s pix, making two books, countless publications, plus $ilver prints sold to rich fat old guys from the 50000 images (incl. scat) he has of her .<br />
The funny part? Chloë NEVER made a cent on this stuff whereas Dahmane owns two flats in Paris with the products of &#8220;his&#8221; (ahem) efforts.</p>
<p>As we speak Chloë des Lysses is broke, on welfare, almost homeless, legally harassed by her ex-husband whereas Dahmane is rich and has become the official snapper for one the French industrial mogul. She&#8217;s considered a whore by the judges therefore she&#8217;ll never ever win in courthouse : she&#8217;s been denied any control over what they did TOGETHER by the French justice (i.e. she&#8217;ll never make a buck on her pix) and she&#8217;s been sentenced to pay her ex-husband taxes for the time they were together. Neat, huh?&#8221;</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.avmaniacs.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31600" rel="nofollow">http://www.avmaniacs.com/forums/showthread.php?t=31600</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bacchus</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/02/a-tribute-to-chloe-des-lysses.html/comment-page-1#comment-11315</link>
		<dc:creator>Bacchus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=8209#comment-11315</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s odd how very differently people process these things.  This is the kind of porn that I wouldn&#039;t bother to pull out of a dumpster.  That aura of detachment that some models have -- and that&#039;s almost all I see with Chloé -- just leaves me totally cold.  It processes visually to me as boredom, and if she&#039;s bored with the scene and her photographer, I&#039;m bored with her before I&#039;m even done looking at the picture.  

I&#039;ve seen these pictures before, of course, but I took a second look to see if I had been missing something.  Nope, she still looks bored, and I&#039;m still not sure why I&#039;m looking at a picture of a bored snooty girl having sex.

The one exception is -- maybe -- the first photo -- but even there her non-bored smile is totally for the photographer, and seems to have nothing to do with the blowjob she is ostensibly performing.  That&#039;s *interesting* because of the story it suggests, but as porn, it&#039;s still weak (for me).

Of course all this is totally &lt;em&gt;de gustibus non disputandem&lt;/em&gt; -- I&#039;m certainly not trying to rain on anybody else&#039;s enjoyment.  Especially as ... given what Violet says about sales histories ... I&#039;m obviously in a minority here.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s odd how very differently people process these things.  This is the kind of porn that I wouldn&#8217;t bother to pull out of a dumpster.  That aura of detachment that some models have &#8212; and that&#8217;s almost all I see with Chloé &#8212; just leaves me totally cold.  It processes visually to me as boredom, and if she&#8217;s bored with the scene and her photographer, I&#8217;m bored with her before I&#8217;m even done looking at the picture.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen these pictures before, of course, but I took a second look to see if I had been missing something.  Nope, she still looks bored, and I&#8217;m still not sure why I&#8217;m looking at a picture of a bored snooty girl having sex.</p>
<p>The one exception is &#8212; maybe &#8212; the first photo &#8212; but even there her non-bored smile is totally for the photographer, and seems to have nothing to do with the blowjob she is ostensibly performing.  That&#8217;s *interesting* because of the story it suggests, but as porn, it&#8217;s still weak (for me).</p>
<p>Of course all this is totally <em>de gustibus non disputandem</em> &#8212; I&#8217;m certainly not trying to rain on anybody else&#8217;s enjoyment.  Especially as &#8230; given what Violet says about sales histories &#8230; I&#8217;m obviously in a minority here.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pony</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2011/02/a-tribute-to-chloe-des-lysses.html/comment-page-1#comment-11306</link>
		<dc:creator>Pony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 11:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=8209#comment-11306</guid>
		<description>Wow. Somehow she manages to be somewhere else entirely, and yet still completely engaged in the sex she&#039;s having. Incredible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Somehow she manages to be somewhere else entirely, and yet still completely engaged in the sex she&#8217;s having. Incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 19:18:36 by W3 Total Cache -->