<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The AIM Clinic Shutdown, Condoms In Porn, HIV Controversy Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/the-aim-clinic-shutdown-condoms-in-porn-hiv-controversy-updates.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/the-aim-clinic-shutdown-condoms-in-porn-hiv-controversy-updates.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Whiteacre</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/the-aim-clinic-shutdown-condoms-in-porn-hiv-controversy-updates.html/comment-page-1#comment-10740</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Whiteacre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 08:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=7159#comment-10740</guid>
		<description>Violet, you are absolutely correct when you write that AHF has an agenda -- it does, and it has nothing to do with public health.

AHF is advancing the position that condom-only pornography would keep everyone safer -- yet the alleged &quot;victim&quot; who Weinstein and Co. have trotted out like the prize pig at the county fair claims to have become infected on a condom-only set!

For those not familiar with the tactics of AHF, I recommend the following brief video clips:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9MOWF94_II&amp;hd=1

and, from the forthcoming video expose by Julie Meadows and myself (on Shelley Lubben and Pink Cross Foundation):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZmLv1w4RZg&amp;hd=1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Violet, you are absolutely correct when you write that AHF has an agenda &#8212; it does, and it has nothing to do with public health.</p>
<p>AHF is advancing the position that condom-only pornography would keep everyone safer &#8212; yet the alleged &#8220;victim&#8221; who Weinstein and Co. have trotted out like the prize pig at the county fair claims to have become infected on a condom-only set!</p>
<p>For those not familiar with the tactics of AHF, I recommend the following brief video clips:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9MOWF94_II&#038;hd=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9MOWF94_II&#038;hd=1</a></p>
<p>and, from the forthcoming video expose by Julie Meadows and myself (on Shelley Lubben and Pink Cross Foundation):</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZmLv1w4RZg&#038;hd=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZmLv1w4RZg&#038;hd=1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/the-aim-clinic-shutdown-condoms-in-porn-hiv-controversy-updates.html/comment-page-1#comment-10428</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 06:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=7159#comment-10428</guid>
		<description>Just make condom use in porn mandatory already. Sexually transmitted diseases are an occupational hazard in the porn industry and it&#039;s CalOSHA&#039;s job to protect workers from occupational hazards.

I know no one is forcing them to do porn, but no one is forced to be a welder, either, and it is illegal to require a welder to work without a mask. Other industries have to give their workers adequate protection from occupational hazards. Why should the porn industry be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just make condom use in porn mandatory already. Sexually transmitted diseases are an occupational hazard in the porn industry and it&#8217;s CalOSHA&#8217;s job to protect workers from occupational hazards.</p>
<p>I know no one is forcing them to do porn, but no one is forced to be a welder, either, and it is illegal to require a welder to work without a mask. Other industries have to give their workers adequate protection from occupational hazards. Why should the porn industry be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iamcuriousblue</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/the-aim-clinic-shutdown-condoms-in-porn-hiv-controversy-updates.html/comment-page-1#comment-10384</link>
		<dc:creator>Iamcuriousblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=7159#comment-10384</guid>
		<description>The thing that a lot of people don&#039;t get about this controversy is how extreme the kind of changes CalOSHA and LA County Public Health want to legislate. Basically, there trying to impose medical worker regulations on porn performers, which would legislate condoms not only for penile/anal and penile/vaginal sex, but *all* oral sex, and possibly including the demand that gloves and goggles be worn at all times!

I notice that the norms of the gay industry (excluding the fringe bareback genre) are held up by many as a model, but a quick look at actual gay porn will show what a gap exists between what most reasonable people think of as safer sex and what AHF, CalOSHA, and the rest are trying to legislate. I just went over to AEBN and had a look at a few scenes directed by none other than Chi Chi LaRue. From what I saw, condoms were used consistently for anal penetration, but they were not used in oral sex and rimming scenes at all. (Though I will note that cum shots seem to be almost always external, and cum-in-mouth scenes seem to be mostly restricted to performers consuming their own.)

I trust that LaRue is somebody who&#039;s making a point of having solid safer sex practices in his movies, yet even what he&#039;s doing would not meet the rigid criteria that CalOSHA says are the established rules that porn sets must follow.

I&#039;ll also note that one of the participants in the CalOSHA porn hearings in LA earlier this year was Girlfriends Films, an all-girl production company. Their afraid they&#039;re going to have the use of dental dams imposed on them, something that&#039;s effectively going to aesthetically kill F/F porn.

Basically, we have a situation where safer sex needs to become more the norm, especially in straight porn. However, the only way that this is being pushed is by public health agencies with an unworkable set of regulations and no ability to enforce them, aided by organizations that either have an agenda of making porn illegal (eg, Pink Cross) or grandstanding and winning turf wars (eg, AIDS Healthcare Foundation).

Meanwhile, the media (including a lot of the sex-positive media, unfortunately) dumbs the whole issue down to the greedy porn industry versus the public health good guys.

The whole situation sucks, really, and not in a good way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that a lot of people don&#8217;t get about this controversy is how extreme the kind of changes CalOSHA and LA County Public Health want to legislate. Basically, there trying to impose medical worker regulations on porn performers, which would legislate condoms not only for penile/anal and penile/vaginal sex, but *all* oral sex, and possibly including the demand that gloves and goggles be worn at all times!</p>
<p>I notice that the norms of the gay industry (excluding the fringe bareback genre) are held up by many as a model, but a quick look at actual gay porn will show what a gap exists between what most reasonable people think of as safer sex and what AHF, CalOSHA, and the rest are trying to legislate. I just went over to AEBN and had a look at a few scenes directed by none other than Chi Chi LaRue. From what I saw, condoms were used consistently for anal penetration, but they were not used in oral sex and rimming scenes at all. (Though I will note that cum shots seem to be almost always external, and cum-in-mouth scenes seem to be mostly restricted to performers consuming their own.)</p>
<p>I trust that LaRue is somebody who&#8217;s making a point of having solid safer sex practices in his movies, yet even what he&#8217;s doing would not meet the rigid criteria that CalOSHA says are the established rules that porn sets must follow.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll also note that one of the participants in the CalOSHA porn hearings in LA earlier this year was Girlfriends Films, an all-girl production company. Their afraid they&#8217;re going to have the use of dental dams imposed on them, something that&#8217;s effectively going to aesthetically kill F/F porn.</p>
<p>Basically, we have a situation where safer sex needs to become more the norm, especially in straight porn. However, the only way that this is being pushed is by public health agencies with an unworkable set of regulations and no ability to enforce them, aided by organizations that either have an agenda of making porn illegal (eg, Pink Cross) or grandstanding and winning turf wars (eg, AIDS Healthcare Foundation).</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the media (including a lot of the sex-positive media, unfortunately) dumbs the whole issue down to the greedy porn industry versus the public health good guys.</p>
<p>The whole situation sucks, really, and not in a good way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler argyle</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/the-aim-clinic-shutdown-condoms-in-porn-hiv-controversy-updates.html/comment-page-1#comment-10367</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler argyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 03:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=7159#comment-10367</guid>
		<description>You know, I&#039;ve had you on twitter for a while and have let links to your artivles come and go by, and I clicked on this one, and had to say that I thoroughly enjoyed it, but also that I should be kicked for not reading these sooner! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I&#8217;ve had you on twitter for a while and have let links to your artivles come and go by, and I clicked on this one, and had to say that I thoroughly enjoyed it, but also that I should be kicked for not reading these sooner! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Forbes</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/the-aim-clinic-shutdown-condoms-in-porn-hiv-controversy-updates.html/comment-page-1#comment-10359</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=7159#comment-10359</guid>
		<description>Well said. It is indeed a mess, and your final statement sums up the worst possible outcome: if the current panicked dialogue results in closure of all of AIM&#039;s facilities while California porn companies and performers are in the middle of during business as usual, there will be a tragic, unnecessary health crisis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. It is indeed a mess, and your final statement sums up the worst possible outcome: if the current panicked dialogue results in closure of all of AIM&#8217;s facilities while California porn companies and performers are in the middle of during business as usual, there will be a tragic, unnecessary health crisis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kit OConnell</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/the-aim-clinic-shutdown-condoms-in-porn-hiv-controversy-updates.html/comment-page-1#comment-10358</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit OConnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=7159#comment-10358</guid>
		<description>Thanks. I had seen mention of the &#039;AIM shutdown&#039; on Twitter, and this gives me a good understanding of the events and groups involved. It sounds like AIM might not be the best, or complete solution to straight porn&#039;s safer sex issues, but it&#039;s clear they are much worse off without them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I had seen mention of the &#8216;AIM shutdown&#8217; on Twitter, and this gives me a good understanding of the events and groups involved. It sounds like AIM might not be the best, or complete solution to straight porn&#8217;s safer sex issues, but it&#8217;s clear they are much worse off without them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 19:16:08 by W3 Total Cache -->