<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking No Prisoners: Women In Tech &#8211; Why Do We Want More?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/taking-no-prisoners-women-in-tech-why-do-we-want-more.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/taking-no-prisoners-women-in-tech-why-do-we-want-more.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Streeter</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/12/taking-no-prisoners-women-in-tech-why-do-we-want-more.html/comment-page-1#comment-10655</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Streeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2010 03:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=7325#comment-10655</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my first reaction to &quot;Tell me why we should have more women in tech&quot;.  To be blunt: Technology Fucking Matters.  I think that we could find agreement to that statement from Arrington, Wired, and yourself.  And to the extent that Technology Fucking Matters - has an important impact on our past, present, and future - we ought to seek to have more women in technology, because they have as big a stake in the outcomes.  What new technologies are developed, and how technology is used, affects every last one of us on this planet, so I would like to see women have an equal stake.  Technology as an industry and process may be flawed - not a true meritocracy - but is that supposed to be an argument _against_ more women being in it, or the argument for?  Just like with democracy: it&#039;s the worst system we have, except for all the rest.  Why should it all be left to the old geeks club?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my first reaction to &#8220;Tell me why we should have more women in tech&#8221;.  To be blunt: Technology Fucking Matters.  I think that we could find agreement to that statement from Arrington, Wired, and yourself.  And to the extent that Technology Fucking Matters &#8211; has an important impact on our past, present, and future &#8211; we ought to seek to have more women in technology, because they have as big a stake in the outcomes.  What new technologies are developed, and how technology is used, affects every last one of us on this planet, so I would like to see women have an equal stake.  Technology as an industry and process may be flawed &#8211; not a true meritocracy &#8211; but is that supposed to be an argument _against_ more women being in it, or the argument for?  Just like with democracy: it&#8217;s the worst system we have, except for all the rest.  Why should it all be left to the old geeks club?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 18:04:25 by W3 Total Cache -->