<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the anti-porn argument according to feminist Ashley-Anne Thompson (antiquelens)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iamcuriousblue</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-2#comment-8430</link>
		<dc:creator>Iamcuriousblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 07:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8430</guid>
		<description>A true pwnage video on our dear Ashley-Anne standing up for a fellow obnoxious radfem:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1wBexp51mQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A true pwnage video on our dear Ashley-Anne standing up for a fellow obnoxious radfem:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1wBexp51mQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1wBexp51mQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iamcuriousblue</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-2#comment-8427</link>
		<dc:creator>Iamcuriousblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 01:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8427</guid>
		<description>As to the Steve Rooster video, that&#039;s got to be the ultimate in sexyfail!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to the Steve Rooster video, that&#8217;s got to be the ultimate in sexyfail!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-2#comment-8418</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 01:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8418</guid>
		<description>That man seriously gave the heeby jeebies!!! =O! EWW...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That man seriously gave the heeby jeebies!!! =O! EWW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheMadShangi</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-2#comment-8414</link>
		<dc:creator>TheMadShangi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 17:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8414</guid>
		<description>She has flagged my videos for using a screen capture from this blog and linking to this blog. I have been accused of &quot;dropping her docs.&quot; She&#039;s a fucking idiot. I&#039;m not going to be nice to her anymore. She needs to stop acting like a baby, she dropped her own docs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She has flagged my videos for using a screen capture from this blog and linking to this blog. I have been accused of &#8220;dropping her docs.&#8221; She&#8217;s a fucking idiot. I&#8217;m not going to be nice to her anymore. She needs to stop acting like a baby, she dropped her own docs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Kennerson</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-2#comment-8410</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Kennerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 03:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8410</guid>
		<description>First, to TheMadShangi and menareangrynow: I stand corrected on your comment...but as someone who doe sympathize with and supports the more open-minded, progressive wing of feminism, I have to stand by my belief that MRA&#039;s and radfems are closer to each other than to the rest of society...in the same way that Brithers and Maoists are so far apart and yet so close to each other. I just so happen to reject them both as equally whack.

And to Violet: Considering that I not only listed Ms. Thompson&#039;s name in my own blog entry about her ranting and pixelatted stalking of you, but even went so far as to include her real name in the title of my post;  I&#039;d think that I would be far more a target for any police actions by her. Fortunately, both the First Amendment and proper netiquette (and the fact that she herself put her real name out there in her original response to you, which she ironically first claimed to be an act of &quot;censorship&quot;) protects both your and my right to expose her slipshodness for the world to see. 

Besides...even her Deviant Art photo page from which she herself posts her real name isn&#039;t immune from her political ideology...she proudly lists Robert Jensen&#039;s antiporn extremist tome &lt;I&gt;Getting Off:  Pornography and Masculinity&lt;/i&gt; as her primary reading source.

In other words, she makes Orly Taitz seem sane in comparison.


Anthony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, to TheMadShangi and menareangrynow: I stand corrected on your comment&#8230;but as someone who doe sympathize with and supports the more open-minded, progressive wing of feminism, I have to stand by my belief that MRA&#8217;s and radfems are closer to each other than to the rest of society&#8230;in the same way that Brithers and Maoists are so far apart and yet so close to each other. I just so happen to reject them both as equally whack.</p>
<p>And to Violet: Considering that I not only listed Ms. Thompson&#8217;s name in my own blog entry about her ranting and pixelatted stalking of you, but even went so far as to include her real name in the title of my post;  I&#8217;d think that I would be far more a target for any police actions by her. Fortunately, both the First Amendment and proper netiquette (and the fact that she herself put her real name out there in her original response to you, which she ironically first claimed to be an act of &#8220;censorship&#8221;) protects both your and my right to expose her slipshodness for the world to see. </p>
<p>Besides&#8230;even her Deviant Art photo page from which she herself posts her real name isn&#8217;t immune from her political ideology&#8230;she proudly lists Robert Jensen&#8217;s antiporn extremist tome <i>Getting Off:  Pornography and Masculinity</i> as her primary reading source.</p>
<p>In other words, she makes Orly Taitz seem sane in comparison.</p>
<p>Anthony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: violet</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-2#comment-8409</link>
		<dc:creator>violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 01:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8409</guid>
		<description>so, Ashley-Anne Thompson has attempted to leave a few comments here, and for obvious reasons I&#039;m not making her an approved commenter. she has not tried to email me or contact me directly about having a conversation, or anything else, and her use of multiple email addresses has made me even more wary. however, I&#039;m pointing out that her last comment is ordering me to take her name off of this post, or she will call the police. 

I am not the first online outlet to publish Ms. Thompson&#039;s name on the internet. I found it through Google very easily, here:

http://kitschykoomag.blogspot.com/2009/05/fab-ashley-anne-thompson.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, Ashley-Anne Thompson has attempted to leave a few comments here, and for obvious reasons I&#8217;m not making her an approved commenter. she has not tried to email me or contact me directly about having a conversation, or anything else, and her use of multiple email addresses has made me even more wary. however, I&#8217;m pointing out that her last comment is ordering me to take her name off of this post, or she will call the police. </p>
<p>I am not the first online outlet to publish Ms. Thompson&#8217;s name on the internet. I found it through Google very easily, here:</p>
<p><a href="http://kitschykoomag.blogspot.com/2009/05/fab-ashley-anne-thompson.html" rel="nofollow">http://kitschykoomag.blogspot.com/2009/05/fab-ashley-anne-thompson.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The MadShangi</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-2#comment-8401</link>
		<dc:creator>The MadShangi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8401</guid>
		<description>Hey, I made a video about this very article. Check it out here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VCuess1WEA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I made a video about this very article. Check it out here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VCuess1WEA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VCuess1WEA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hyena</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-2#comment-8400</link>
		<dc:creator>hyena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8400</guid>
		<description>Feminism  is incredibly varied, varies from person to person,  and to let one person&#039;s  (or a few peoples) view cause you to denounce the name of feminism altogether is unfortunate. Feminism at its base is believing in human rights, equality, and empowering the traditionally disempowered. Unfortunately a fear of the word has been perpetuated by mainstream media, and thus misinformation about its meaning.  Most women who call themselves feminists are very much pro-sex and pleasure, but many do have problems with aspects of pornography, usually in general the depiction of women in mainstream porn and/or the treatment of women in the porn industry. However, most feminists I know, while tending to prefer alternative venues, enjoy watching porn, reading erotica, and using sex toys as much as the next sexually healthy and  empowered person. And although i havent followed this blog for very long, I think you, violet blue, have done a lot to provide info and access to alternative resources that are very sexually empowering, playful and beautiful. For me, that is a big part what feminism is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feminism  is incredibly varied, varies from person to person,  and to let one person&#8217;s  (or a few peoples) view cause you to denounce the name of feminism altogether is unfortunate. Feminism at its base is believing in human rights, equality, and empowering the traditionally disempowered. Unfortunately a fear of the word has been perpetuated by mainstream media, and thus misinformation about its meaning.  Most women who call themselves feminists are very much pro-sex and pleasure, but many do have problems with aspects of pornography, usually in general the depiction of women in mainstream porn and/or the treatment of women in the porn industry. However, most feminists I know, while tending to prefer alternative venues, enjoy watching porn, reading erotica, and using sex toys as much as the next sexually healthy and  empowered person. And although i havent followed this blog for very long, I think you, violet blue, have done a lot to provide info and access to alternative resources that are very sexually empowering, playful and beautiful. For me, that is a big part what feminism is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menareangrynow</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-2#comment-8398</link>
		<dc:creator>menareangrynow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8398</guid>
		<description>@Anthony Kennerson

&quot;Antifeminist MRA’s and antiporn radfems are more closer to each other than they are to the rest of the real world&quot;

Really? I tend to think the rest of the world are somewhere in the middle, in a tug-o-war match between the afore mentioned groups. I as an antifeminist MRA don&#039;t tend to think of myself as anywhere near an antiporn feminist; because I support the right of people to choose whatever jobs they want, including being a porn star. In addition, I don&#039;t believe in other major tenets of feminism such as patriarchy theory, as I find it historically lacking and a borderline conspiracy theory, not that different from what NWO supporters profess.

Anyway, that&#039;s my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Anthony Kennerson</p>
<p>&#8220;Antifeminist MRA’s and antiporn radfems are more closer to each other than they are to the rest of the real world&#8221;</p>
<p>Really? I tend to think the rest of the world are somewhere in the middle, in a tug-o-war match between the afore mentioned groups. I as an antifeminist MRA don&#8217;t tend to think of myself as anywhere near an antiporn feminist; because I support the right of people to choose whatever jobs they want, including being a porn star. In addition, I don&#8217;t believe in other major tenets of feminism such as patriarchy theory, as I find it historically lacking and a borderline conspiracy theory, not that different from what NWO supporters profess.</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The MadShangi</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8395</link>
		<dc:creator>The MadShangi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8395</guid>
		<description>Who says that I agree with men being rapists and women being sluts? I know I made a comment about sometimes women want to be used as fuck objects, but that was meant to be a joke. Well, a half joke. It was meant to clarify that women enjoy sex and there&#039;s nothing wrong with that.  Interestingly enough, not long after Antiquelens made this video whining about the comment I posted here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZDlQ5jJrHY - one of my videos got flagged. Uh-oh, drama! LMAO! 

The reason why I posted the comment I posted here int he first place was because I checked out this page out of curiosity, then I find out the kind of shit that Antique was writing to Violet Blue. She supports violence against women because she likes porn? What the fuck? Ashley needs to grow the fuck up and stop acting like a child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who says that I agree with men being rapists and women being sluts? I know I made a comment about sometimes women want to be used as fuck objects, but that was meant to be a joke. Well, a half joke. It was meant to clarify that women enjoy sex and there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that.  Interestingly enough, not long after Antiquelens made this video whining about the comment I posted here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZDlQ5jJrHY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZDlQ5jJrHY</a> &#8211; one of my videos got flagged. Uh-oh, drama! LMAO! </p>
<p>The reason why I posted the comment I posted here int he first place was because I checked out this page out of curiosity, then I find out the kind of shit that Antique was writing to Violet Blue. She supports violence against women because she likes porn? What the fuck? Ashley needs to grow the fuck up and stop acting like a child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Kennerson</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8394</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Kennerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8394</guid>
		<description>Yeesh.  Nothing like a zealout to start your day.

Unfortumately, like IACB, I&#039;ve battled her kind countless times before (though never to the extent of the extreme dwama gueen heights that Ms. Thompson seems to scale with ease).  It does seem as if she&#039;s more into trolling for attention and publicity, all the while playing the &quot;damsel in distress being censored for her &#039;radical&#039; views&quot; card to the hilt.

It would be so easy to just ignore her and not feed her Messiah complex...but the sad thing is, her ideology concerning porn and sex work is slowly but steadily being digested and consumed by plenty of &quot;progressive&quot; and &quot;liberal&quot;, if not &quot;leftist&quot; intellectuals and personalities, and that is making the struggle for expanding sexual freedom and defending sexual expression that much more difficult.  Far better to expose her to the light of day and then ridicule her extreme behavior than to let it fester and suddenly explode.

I should say, though, that I have an equal problem with the response of TheMadShangi, whose brand of &quot;masculinism&quot;/MRA lunacy feeds as much into and reenforces the equal lunacy of antiiquelens&#039; brand of antipornradfem madness.  Sorry, but the answer to her claims that &quot;all men are rapists, and any woman who likes and uses porn as a personal means of sexual pleasure is either an enabler of rapists or simply a brainless slut&quot; should NOT be &quot;Yes, men are rapists and women are sluts; that&#039;s what we like about it!!! So what?&quot; 

Antifeminist MRA&#039;s and antiporn radfems are more closer to each other than they are to the rest of the real world; maybe they should take their smackdowns to a far away island and leave the rest of us alone.

At any rate, good job refuting her madness. 


Anthony</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeesh.  Nothing like a zealout to start your day.</p>
<p>Unfortumately, like IACB, I&#8217;ve battled her kind countless times before (though never to the extent of the extreme dwama gueen heights that Ms. Thompson seems to scale with ease).  It does seem as if she&#8217;s more into trolling for attention and publicity, all the while playing the &#8220;damsel in distress being censored for her &#8216;radical&#8217; views&#8221; card to the hilt.</p>
<p>It would be so easy to just ignore her and not feed her Messiah complex&#8230;but the sad thing is, her ideology concerning porn and sex work is slowly but steadily being digested and consumed by plenty of &#8220;progressive&#8221; and &#8220;liberal&#8221;, if not &#8220;leftist&#8221; intellectuals and personalities, and that is making the struggle for expanding sexual freedom and defending sexual expression that much more difficult.  Far better to expose her to the light of day and then ridicule her extreme behavior than to let it fester and suddenly explode.</p>
<p>I should say, though, that I have an equal problem with the response of TheMadShangi, whose brand of &#8220;masculinism&#8221;/MRA lunacy feeds as much into and reenforces the equal lunacy of antiiquelens&#8217; brand of antipornradfem madness.  Sorry, but the answer to her claims that &#8220;all men are rapists, and any woman who likes and uses porn as a personal means of sexual pleasure is either an enabler of rapists or simply a brainless slut&#8221; should NOT be &#8220;Yes, men are rapists and women are sluts; that&#8217;s what we like about it!!! So what?&#8221; </p>
<p>Antifeminist MRA&#8217;s and antiporn radfems are more closer to each other than they are to the rest of the real world; maybe they should take their smackdowns to a far away island and leave the rest of us alone.</p>
<p>At any rate, good job refuting her madness. </p>
<p>Anthony</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aranjedeath</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8392</link>
		<dc:creator>Aranjedeath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 05:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8392</guid>
		<description>Huh. She reminds me of my grandmother, but younger and better dressed. (That&#039;s not a good thing, just so we&#039;re clear).
Relevant quote:
You are never dedicated to something you have 
complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting
that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it 
is going to rise tomorrow. When people are 
fanatically dedicated to political or religious 
faiths or any other kinds of dogmas or goals, it&#039;s
always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt.
- Robert M. Pirsig (Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance)
I have a strange feeling her zealotry is just a smoke and mirrors case of her needing to cling to something extreme, so she has something solid (if misaligned) to identify with. I hope that changes, but that&#039;s like hoping the sun won&#039;t rise tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh. She reminds me of my grandmother, but younger and better dressed. (That&#8217;s not a good thing, just so we&#8217;re clear).<br />
Relevant quote:<br />
You are never dedicated to something you have<br />
complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting<br />
that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it<br />
is going to rise tomorrow. When people are<br />
fanatically dedicated to political or religious<br />
faiths or any other kinds of dogmas or goals, it&#8217;s<br />
always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt.<br />
- Robert M. Pirsig (Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance)<br />
I have a strange feeling her zealotry is just a smoke and mirrors case of her needing to cling to something extreme, so she has something solid (if misaligned) to identify with. I hope that changes, but that&#8217;s like hoping the sun won&#8217;t rise tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iamcuriousblue</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8391</link>
		<dc:creator>Iamcuriousblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 03:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8391</guid>
		<description>It looks like you&#039;ve discovered everybody&#039;s favorite anti-porn drama queen. I&#039;ve had run-ins for several months now with her and her YouTube buddies, who are for the most part pretty nasty pieces of work toward anybody who doesn&#039;t buy into their odd combination of conservative sexual ideology and half-understood more-radical-than-thou marxism/feminism. Having seen a number of her videos where she talks about her background, its clear just how lost the poor girl is – she&#039;s basically a combination of an extremely sheltered upbringing (basically, from some tiny jerkwater in British Columbia where she was the only person who wasn&#039;t an xtian), zero sexual experience and outright fear of the larger sexual culture, mental illness (alcoholism, depression, etc), and an obvious need for attention (she had largely burned through trolling YouTube before moving on to you). Now she&#039;s found fundamentalist feminism and is absolutely running with it. She&#039;s largely in the irritating-but-harmless category, except for her occasional talk of bombing porn shops.

The only thing I&#039;d fault in your response, Violet, is that you gave her a blog post and link at all, because its largely succeeded in generating publicity for her video channel, which is probably her intention to begin with. But you probably know this.

As could be predicted, she&#039;s posting numerous followup videos trying to milk this for all its worth. She&#039;s accused Violet of &quot;censoring&quot; her for not posting her responses here in the comments. Highly ironic, since this is AL&#039;s exact m.o. vis a vis blocking pretty much all critical commentators on her channel, but then consistency between what she dishes out and the kind of treatment she demands from others has never exactly been AL&#039;s strong suit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like you&#8217;ve discovered everybody&#8217;s favorite anti-porn drama queen. I&#8217;ve had run-ins for several months now with her and her YouTube buddies, who are for the most part pretty nasty pieces of work toward anybody who doesn&#8217;t buy into their odd combination of conservative sexual ideology and half-understood more-radical-than-thou marxism/feminism. Having seen a number of her videos where she talks about her background, its clear just how lost the poor girl is – she&#8217;s basically a combination of an extremely sheltered upbringing (basically, from some tiny jerkwater in British Columbia where she was the only person who wasn&#8217;t an xtian), zero sexual experience and outright fear of the larger sexual culture, mental illness (alcoholism, depression, etc), and an obvious need for attention (she had largely burned through trolling YouTube before moving on to you). Now she&#8217;s found fundamentalist feminism and is absolutely running with it. She&#8217;s largely in the irritating-but-harmless category, except for her occasional talk of bombing porn shops.</p>
<p>The only thing I&#8217;d fault in your response, Violet, is that you gave her a blog post and link at all, because its largely succeeded in generating publicity for her video channel, which is probably her intention to begin with. But you probably know this.</p>
<p>As could be predicted, she&#8217;s posting numerous followup videos trying to milk this for all its worth. She&#8217;s accused Violet of &#8220;censoring&#8221; her for not posting her responses here in the comments. Highly ironic, since this is AL&#8217;s exact m.o. vis a vis blocking pretty much all critical commentators on her channel, but then consistency between what she dishes out and the kind of treatment she demands from others has never exactly been AL&#8217;s strong suit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Heffernan</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8390</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Heffernan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8390</guid>
		<description>Okay sure we&#039;ve heard the argument before and most of us disagree with it, but I actually thought the video was kind of funny.  And let&#039;s face it, she&#039;s not the most offensive imitator of VB out there -- there&#039;s that porn actress going by the same name who expresses racist anti-immigrant sentiments in interviews and is occasionally mistaken for Our Own Face of Innovation by those who make sense of the world through Google searches.

But I think the satire really falls flat when we have the corrective voice of the &quot;real&quot; Ashley Anne.  To compare great things with small, it&#039;s as if Jonathan Swift cropped up in the middle of &quot;A Modest Proposal&quot; to earnestly declaim, &quot;No!  The eating of children is WRONG!&quot;  It would have been more effective to stay in the VB persona and make the satire work purely on the merits of the mockery.  But that, I&#039;m afraid, is where the talents of Ashley-Anne stop unceremoniously at the water&#039;s edge.

Thanks for posting the link to this, VB, and thanks for your always thoughtful writing on the many subjects you tackle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay sure we&#8217;ve heard the argument before and most of us disagree with it, but I actually thought the video was kind of funny.  And let&#8217;s face it, she&#8217;s not the most offensive imitator of VB out there &#8212; there&#8217;s that porn actress going by the same name who expresses racist anti-immigrant sentiments in interviews and is occasionally mistaken for Our Own Face of Innovation by those who make sense of the world through Google searches.</p>
<p>But I think the satire really falls flat when we have the corrective voice of the &#8220;real&#8221; Ashley Anne.  To compare great things with small, it&#8217;s as if Jonathan Swift cropped up in the middle of &#8220;A Modest Proposal&#8221; to earnestly declaim, &#8220;No!  The eating of children is WRONG!&#8221;  It would have been more effective to stay in the VB persona and make the satire work purely on the merits of the mockery.  But that, I&#8217;m afraid, is where the talents of Ashley-Anne stop unceremoniously at the water&#8217;s edge.</p>
<p>Thanks for posting the link to this, VB, and thanks for your always thoughtful writing on the many subjects you tackle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The MadShangi</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8389</link>
		<dc:creator>The MadShangi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8389</guid>
		<description>Some women wanna be used like fuck objects. So what the hell&#039;s wrong with that? Holla!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some women wanna be used like fuck objects. So what the hell&#8217;s wrong with that? Holla!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Naughty</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8387</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Naughty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8387</guid>
		<description>Ad hominem attack = inability to argue their point like a grown up = ignore.

I found myself wondering what it means to be Anti Quelens. Leave the Quelens alone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ad hominem attack = inability to argue their point like a grown up = ignore.</p>
<p>I found myself wondering what it means to be Anti Quelens. Leave the Quelens alone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheMadShangi</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8379</link>
		<dc:creator>TheMadShangi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 05:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8379</guid>
		<description>Hello there. On YouTube I call myself The MadShangi. I make anti-feminist videos and I&#039;m quite familiar with the antiquelens character. She&#039;s a nice girl, if a bit misguided by her feminist buddies. I never heard of you or this blog, until she made those videos about you. I was curious enough to leave a comment. I asked her, &quot;What exactly do YOU know about sex?&quot; It was an honest question, because I know that she&#039;s a virgin. Nothing wrong with being a virgin, but she got angry at me for posting that comment on her channel for all to see. I wonder why. Not to attack antique or anything, but I find it odd that someone with no sexual experience would have the nerve to attack someone else&#039;s supposed knowledge of sexuality. I also find it odd that given Antique&#039;s taste in movies - she would be so anti-porn. I do not see pornography as violence to women. It would have to depend on the porn and the intent of the filmmakers. Here is a vid I made PWNing one of her anti-porn buddies. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOyMX0v-1SI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there. On YouTube I call myself The MadShangi. I make anti-feminist videos and I&#8217;m quite familiar with the antiquelens character. She&#8217;s a nice girl, if a bit misguided by her feminist buddies. I never heard of you or this blog, until she made those videos about you. I was curious enough to leave a comment. I asked her, &#8220;What exactly do YOU know about sex?&#8221; It was an honest question, because I know that she&#8217;s a virgin. Nothing wrong with being a virgin, but she got angry at me for posting that comment on her channel for all to see. I wonder why. Not to attack antique or anything, but I find it odd that someone with no sexual experience would have the nerve to attack someone else&#8217;s supposed knowledge of sexuality. I also find it odd that given Antique&#8217;s taste in movies &#8211; she would be so anti-porn. I do not see pornography as violence to women. It would have to depend on the porn and the intent of the filmmakers. Here is a vid I made PWNing one of her anti-porn buddies. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOyMX0v-1SI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOyMX0v-1SI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dez</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8374</link>
		<dc:creator>Dez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8374</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s right about one thing, dopamine is the reward neurotransmitter that activates in your brain when you have an orgasm.

Er, but how does that affect a relationship negatively? Probably depends on the person, but never undervalue the power of human reasoning, which is also an important function of the human brain. If anything, a failed monogamous relationship &quot;affected negatively by porn&quot; is likely just the result of a lack of common sense, devotion, or intimate compatibility, and not the porn itself.

By the way, I do get the impression that despite the hate messages and poorly supported counter-arguments, that she is indeed a big fan of yours, since she apparently seems to enjoy cosplaying you. ^_~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s right about one thing, dopamine is the reward neurotransmitter that activates in your brain when you have an orgasm.</p>
<p>Er, but how does that affect a relationship negatively? Probably depends on the person, but never undervalue the power of human reasoning, which is also an important function of the human brain. If anything, a failed monogamous relationship &#8220;affected negatively by porn&#8221; is likely just the result of a lack of common sense, devotion, or intimate compatibility, and not the porn itself.</p>
<p>By the way, I do get the impression that despite the hate messages and poorly supported counter-arguments, that she is indeed a big fan of yours, since she apparently seems to enjoy cosplaying you. ^_~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edilberto</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8372</link>
		<dc:creator>Edilberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8372</guid>
		<description>You should have put some quotation marks around the word &quot;Feminist&quot; while describing her. She is so catty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have put some quotation marks around the word &#8220;Feminist&#8221; while describing her. She is so catty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LavenderDoll</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8368</link>
		<dc:creator>LavenderDoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8368</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad someone else mentioned the Leonard Cohen thing.  I really don&#039;t *need* to watch this, it&#039;ll just make me bummed - but I will add that it&#039;s her brand of thinking that influenced mine to be INSUFFERABLE for like, four years.  I was on hormonal birth control and had NO libido, but decided to blame it on all the &quot;misuse&quot; of myself in previous years.  If I could just be good enough, &quot;female&quot; enough, feminist enough, I would stop wanting all these horrible influences and my libido would magically come back, one sexuality, &quot;acceptable&quot; desires and none o&#039; that WEIRDNESS that made me go all dry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad someone else mentioned the Leonard Cohen thing.  I really don&#8217;t *need* to watch this, it&#8217;ll just make me bummed &#8211; but I will add that it&#8217;s her brand of thinking that influenced mine to be INSUFFERABLE for like, four years.  I was on hormonal birth control and had NO libido, but decided to blame it on all the &#8220;misuse&#8221; of myself in previous years.  If I could just be good enough, &#8220;female&#8221; enough, feminist enough, I would stop wanting all these horrible influences and my libido would magically come back, one sexuality, &#8220;acceptable&#8221; desires and none o&#8217; that WEIRDNESS that made me go all dry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon w</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8366</link>
		<dc:creator>jon w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8366</guid>
		<description>another asshole who wants to control what consenting adults do with their bodies. but she does look good dressed as you. I&#039;m sure mine wasnt the only negative comment on her video that she deleted. pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another asshole who wants to control what consenting adults do with their bodies. but she does look good dressed as you. I&#8217;m sure mine wasnt the only negative comment on her video that she deleted. pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8358</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 01:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8358</guid>
		<description>What a repressed lunatic.  She appears to be quite obsessed with Leonard Cohen, which is pretty hilarious given her hatred of BDSM.  

www.sadtrombone.com was made for this girl&#039;s life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a repressed lunatic.  She appears to be quite obsessed with Leonard Cohen, which is pretty hilarious given her hatred of BDSM.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sadtrombone.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sadtrombone.com</a> was made for this girl&#8217;s life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sirkut</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8357</link>
		<dc:creator>Sirkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8357</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s the solution to our problems - an antidote for dopamine!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s the solution to our problems &#8211; an antidote for dopamine!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8356</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8356</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t know about anyone else, but a bunch of strawmen, ad hominem attacks, slippery slope fallacies, and laundry lists of buzz words convinced me!!  

Seriously? It&#039;s so much easier to blame an object. It was the porn, the games, the chess, the D&amp;D, the Beethoven, whatever the moral-panic-of-the-moment may be, it always looks ridiculous over later decades, yet even now people can&#039;t stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t know about anyone else, but a bunch of strawmen, ad hominem attacks, slippery slope fallacies, and laundry lists of buzz words convinced me!!  </p>
<p>Seriously? It&#8217;s so much easier to blame an object. It was the porn, the games, the chess, the D&amp;D, the Beethoven, whatever the moral-panic-of-the-moment may be, it always looks ridiculous over later decades, yet even now people can&#8217;t stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/the-anti-porn-argument-according-to-feminist-ashley-anne-thompson-antiquelens.html/comment-page-1#comment-8354</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4485#comment-8354</guid>
		<description>I little more (already too much) thought, and now I think she&#039;s actually an astoundingly skilled troll.  Her video contains personal attacks to inflame, easily refuted factual mistakes to insure *some* response, fuzzy facts to provide maneuvering room, and stereotypes to invite return personal attacks.  As a work of troll art, her video is perfect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I little more (already too much) thought, and now I think she&#8217;s actually an astoundingly skilled troll.  Her video contains personal attacks to inflame, easily refuted factual mistakes to insure *some* response, fuzzy facts to provide maneuvering room, and stereotypes to invite return personal attacks.  As a work of troll art, her video is perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 19:30:07 by W3 Total Cache -->