<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: revealed: the lusty bedroom behavior of Victorian-era women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/revealed-the-lusty-bedroom-behavior-of-victorian-era-women.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/revealed-the-lusty-bedroom-behavior-of-victorian-era-women.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly Parrot</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/revealed-the-lusty-bedroom-behavior-of-victorian-era-women.html/comment-page-1#comment-8399</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly Parrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4426#comment-8399</guid>
		<description>I think I should point out. This was posted to a website on April 1st at 8:00am.

Have you independantly verified the source? It sounds like a prank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I should point out. This was posted to a website on April 1st at 8:00am.</p>
<p>Have you independantly verified the source? It sounds like a prank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: criolle johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/revealed-the-lusty-bedroom-behavior-of-victorian-era-women.html/comment-page-1#comment-8249</link>
		<dc:creator>criolle johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 02:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4426#comment-8249</guid>
		<description>Now the &quot;kink&quot; link is doing the same thing!  McAfee claims that the web site has to contact THEM to correct the alerts.
It IS alarming.  I rely on you to clear these links before I connect.  I understand that the internet is a wilderness with obvious risks.  Your sponsors need to keep up with these alerts if they want to keep customers.
This sort of nonsense could cost them a lot of currency and you a lot of credibility.

&quot;They only need a small excuse ... &quot;  Jesus Christ, Superstar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the &#8220;kink&#8221; link is doing the same thing!  McAfee claims that the web site has to contact THEM to correct the alerts.<br />
It IS alarming.  I rely on you to clear these links before I connect.  I understand that the internet is a wilderness with obvious risks.  Your sponsors need to keep up with these alerts if they want to keep customers.<br />
This sort of nonsense could cost them a lot of currency and you a lot of credibility.</p>
<p>&#8220;They only need a small excuse &#8230; &#8221;  Jesus Christ, Superstar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpencerAlanMacLeod</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/revealed-the-lusty-bedroom-behavior-of-victorian-era-women.html/comment-page-1#comment-8248</link>
		<dc:creator>SpencerAlanMacLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4426#comment-8248</guid>
		<description>Hello Ms. Blue,

Like ‘Criolle Johnny’, I didn’t know how else to get a hold of you other than to use this blog.

Your blog post on ‘Lusty Victorian Behaviour in the Bedroom’ was most interesting.

If you are interested in more information on the (relatively) recent history of sex and society, you might consider the following.

‘Bonk’, The curious coupling of science and sex by Mary Roach.
This is her website (and no, I do not have any affiliation with her).
http://www.maryroach.net/

Among other things, it has some interesting historical tidbits on the history of sex and society.

Regards, SpencerAlanMacLeod</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Ms. Blue,</p>
<p>Like ‘Criolle Johnny’, I didn’t know how else to get a hold of you other than to use this blog.</p>
<p>Your blog post on ‘Lusty Victorian Behaviour in the Bedroom’ was most interesting.</p>
<p>If you are interested in more information on the (relatively) recent history of sex and society, you might consider the following.</p>
<p>‘Bonk’, The curious coupling of science and sex by Mary Roach.<br />
This is her website (and no, I do not have any affiliation with her).<br />
<a href="http://www.maryroach.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.maryroach.net/</a></p>
<p>Among other things, it has some interesting historical tidbits on the history of sex and society.</p>
<p>Regards, SpencerAlanMacLeod</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: criolle johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/revealed-the-lusty-bedroom-behavior-of-victorian-era-women.html/comment-page-1#comment-8247</link>
		<dc:creator>criolle johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 21:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4426#comment-8247</guid>
		<description>Many thanks, I feel very awkward (and apologize for) using the comments section to contact you.  Have I perhaps, missed the &quot;contact&quot; link on your page?

Bright Blessings</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks, I feel very awkward (and apologize for) using the comments section to contact you.  Have I perhaps, missed the &#8220;contact&#8221; link on your page?</p>
<p>Bright Blessings</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: violet</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/revealed-the-lusty-bedroom-behavior-of-victorian-era-women.html/comment-page-1#comment-8246</link>
		<dc:creator>violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4426#comment-8246</guid>
		<description>johnny, I&#039;ve run a number of tests and it&#039;s not Life Erotic; it&#039;s looking like it&#039;s MacAfee. looking through MacAfee forums I&#039;ve discovered that MacAfee is set to freak out about redirects -- which is troubling because I&#039;m concerned that MacAfee would not know how to handle friendly (or permanent) redirects, which are on the increase in general internet use, and even have Google-safe guidelines. that worries me in general. for instance, my old, original blog page has a redirect on it because it had a different URL than my age check page -- I started blogging back before blogging software was available, and also before browser-intelligent age check pages. (I did everything by hand.)

basically, I have not one but two redirects on the URL so that I can track the traffic myself and compare it to their reports. I do it with all my sponsors now, so that I can hold them to third party traffic reports. MacAfee might be seeing my redirect as a browser hijack -- which to me means they need to fix their browser hijack security specs because it&#039;s too general. and too general can sometimes  = exploitable security flaw.

but Life Erotic is clean. (incidentally, that&#039;s one of the reasons they passed my vetting process)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>johnny, I&#8217;ve run a number of tests and it&#8217;s not Life Erotic; it&#8217;s looking like it&#8217;s MacAfee. looking through MacAfee forums I&#8217;ve discovered that MacAfee is set to freak out about redirects &#8212; which is troubling because I&#8217;m concerned that MacAfee would not know how to handle friendly (or permanent) redirects, which are on the increase in general internet use, and even have Google-safe guidelines. that worries me in general. for instance, my old, original blog page has a redirect on it because it had a different URL than my age check page &#8212; I started blogging back before blogging software was available, and also before browser-intelligent age check pages. (I did everything by hand.)</p>
<p>basically, I have not one but two redirects on the URL so that I can track the traffic myself and compare it to their reports. I do it with all my sponsors now, so that I can hold them to third party traffic reports. MacAfee might be seeing my redirect as a browser hijack &#8212; which to me means they need to fix their browser hijack security specs because it&#8217;s too general. and too general can sometimes  = exploitable security flaw.</p>
<p>but Life Erotic is clean. (incidentally, that&#8217;s one of the reasons they passed my vetting process)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: violet</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/revealed-the-lusty-bedroom-behavior-of-victorian-era-women.html/comment-page-1#comment-8245</link>
		<dc:creator>violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 19:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4426#comment-8245</guid>
		<description>thank you -- doing so right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you &#8212; doing so right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: criolle johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/04/revealed-the-lusty-bedroom-behavior-of-victorian-era-women.html/comment-page-1#comment-8242</link>
		<dc:creator>criolle johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4426#comment-8242</guid>
		<description>The new &quot;the life erotic&quot; site sponsor sent my anti-virus software (McAfee adviser) into a tizzy.  Could you please check on that for us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new &#8220;the life erotic&#8221; site sponsor sent my anti-virus software (McAfee adviser) into a tizzy.  Could you please check on that for us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 18:24:35 by W3 Total Cache -->