Comments on: DA threatens Wisconsin teachers: sex ed will get you arrested

By: LibertyVini

LibertyVini — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:26:03 +0000

I am thinking it may be time for a separation of sex ed and state. Why do we continue to submit the exercise of our inherent rights to a majority vote?

By: Thadius Krueger

Thadius Krueger — Sun, 11 Apr 2010 08:21:26 +0000

Living in Wisconsin, and spending time in Tomah(Juneau County) most of the people don’t follow this ridiculous mind set. We will not let this “Tea Bagger” mess with our rights and freedoms. Tomah elected Ed Thompson who ran on Jesse Ventura’s independent ticket is the Mayor and the locals won’t let this radical tell them how to raise their kids.

Let this Jackass know he Fucked up his career!!

By: Katie

Katie — Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:54:41 +0000

This is, perhaps, what makes Southland think he’s got a case:
Wisconsin Statute 948.02(2) states that “whoever has sexual contact or sexual intercourse with a person who has not attained the age of 16 years is guilty of a Class C felony.” (Wisconsin State Legislature, http://www.legis.state.wi.us/ )
And that really does mean WHOEVER.
“In the State of Wisconsin, any time a person under the age of sixteen engages in an act that is more sexually intimate than a kiss, a serious felony is committed. Should both partners be underage, then by the same act each is simultaneously a victim and a perpetrator.” (Daryl J. Olszewski, “Statutory Rape In Wisconsin: History, Rationale, And The Need For Reform,” http://law.marquette.edu/lawreview/Spring%202006/Olszewski.pdf )
Despite the new sex ed law, Wisconsin law regarding the sexuality of teens is still in need of adjustment.

By: Tim

Tim — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:54:57 +0000

*stares dumbly at the screen*

I have to stop reading tiny nibbles in the morning…or one day I will go postal on the conservatives…and start chucking condoms and sex education pamphlets and erotica into high school windows.

By: Dez

Dez — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 16:44:39 +0000

“(…) Southworth’s letter says the law undermines parental authority…”
I find this amusing. Even if the law was changed to not undermine parental authority, teens still become curious. They’re still going to learn eventually, either the easy way or the hard way, with or without their parent’s permission.

Here’s the implied message I picture coming from this DA, Southworth: “Hey you’re breaking the law by following this other law! My God is bigger than urs. Lrn ur 10 cmd-ments bish.” (lulz)

By: David

David — Thu, 08 Apr 2010 06:16:43 +0000

‘Cause, you know, he’s REALLY going to have no problems making criminal charges stick to people who are abiding by the requirements of a state law. For a DA, he seems to be lacking in understanding of hierarchal jurisdiction. (And I’ll bet you dimes to dollars that his supporters complain incessantly about “bureaucrats in Washington wasting our tax dollars”, all while egging this idiot on with pointless court battles.)