Comments on: new Kinsey study shows sex is in the eye of the beholder http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/03/new-kinsey-study-shows-sex-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder.html Journalist and author Violet Blue's site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more. Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Neil A http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/03/new-kinsey-study-shows-sex-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder.html/comment-page-1#comment-8009 Neil A Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:42:52 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4204#comment-8009 Just to say wow what a picture, see through red panties with a shaven pussy a sure fire fav of mine espeically when being taken off by lovely tittied babe....enough to give me cause for ejaculation whether in a pussy or not! Just to say wow what a picture, see through red panties with a shaven pussy a sure fire fav of mine espeically when being taken off by lovely tittied babe….enough to give me cause for ejaculation whether in a pussy or not!

]]> By: Abolitionist http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/03/new-kinsey-study-shows-sex-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder.html/comment-page-1#comment-8004 Abolitionist Fri, 12 Mar 2010 07:19:54 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4204#comment-8004 or it means that 5% were not capable of understanding larger words like intercourse, ejaculation, and what a new acronym (to them) like PVI means. Which would also mean a larger error rate than intended. or it means that 5% were not capable of understanding larger words like intercourse, ejaculation, and what a new acronym (to them) like PVI means. Which would also mean a larger error rate than intended.

]]> By: R http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2010/03/new-kinsey-study-shows-sex-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder.html/comment-page-1#comment-7949 R Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:14:33 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=4204#comment-7949 <i>"95 percent of respondents would consider penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI) having had sex, but this rate drops to 89 percent if there is no ejaculation."</i> I can sort of get the quibbling about ejaculation. But this means that 5% of the respondents did not think that penile-vaginal intercourse with ejaculation to be "having sex." Which leads one to ask: what <i>would</i> count as sex to these people? “95 percent of respondents would consider penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI) having had sex, but this rate drops to 89 percent if there is no ejaculation.”

I can sort of get the quibbling about ejaculation. But this means that 5% of the respondents did not think that penile-vaginal intercourse with ejaculation to be “having sex.” Which leads one to ask: what would count as sex to these people?

]]>