Comments on: following up on the “sex robot”

By: criolle johnny

criolle johnny — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:42:45 +0000

“I’d still rather fuck my hand than that thing.”

How many female readers would say the same about “JimmyJane”?

Sauce for the goose … This is why I LOVE Violet’s columns! She has “Best Women’s Erotica”, “female-directed public sex”, “girls on top”, etc. There is no sexism EITHER WAY and if you make a fool of yourself, she’ll let you know about it!

As for having sex with an A/I and calling it a person, you can wipe the memory of an A/I. How many of us wish we could do that with an “ex”?

les bon temps roulez

By: R

Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:33:41 +0000

Ironically, if one imagines the technology going to its logical ultimate conclusion — realio trulio Artificial Intelligence — then it becomes a person (albeit an artificial one) and you’re right back where you started, having sex with people.

Fortunately for the nascent sexbot industry, the Singularity seems to be a ways off yet.

So far as I could tell, there was really very little to “Roxxxy” — basically Eliza stuffed into a RealDoll, teetering on the precipice of the uncanny valley. I’ve been hard up in my day, but I’d still rather fuck my hand than that thing.

By: criolle johnny

criolle johnny — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:35:58 +0000

“Why are people so obsessed with the idea of sex robots?”

… and the top right corner of your web site shows an advertisement for “JIMMYJANE”?

Ahem. “an automatically guided machine, able to do tasks on its own.”

Then you could follow the Kink.com links to the machines site. I believe THEY certainly meet the definition of robots!

Are you really upset about MEN using robots, or are you upset that men are catching up with women?

Still hoping to send some candles for your birthday!