First, you seem to be talking about the general class of prevention methods called microbicides. Development of microbicides in general started before 2006. See http://www.global-campaign.org/timeline.htm

Second, I would not call this a breakthrough, although it is absolutely encouraging and (as far as I know) a new direction for microbicide-type research. But proof in the lab, and publication in such a basic science journal as Advanced Functional Materials, is not at all the same as proof in clinical trials in the field. MOST compounds that work in vitro fail before reaching market.

Third, more important breakthroughs have happened recently. From the link above, “HPTN035 provides first human data showing that vaginal gel can reduce HIV risk for women”. See http://www.hptn.org/research_studies/hptn035.asp for more details.

Fourth, I agree with your statement that it is problematic that many women are not able to negotiate condom use with their partners. But why the focus on Africa? This is true for some women all over the world, including in San Francisco.

Last, to ChicksonSpeedSpotter, the absolutism of the statement that “old school prevention doesnt [sic] work” is wrong (again, in its absolutism) for nearly every definition of “old school prevention”. In particular, condoms: condoms work under at least some circumstances, for at least some people. Rejecting ALL “old school prevention” strikes me as hyperbolic and unhelpful.

Thanks.

Exactly! this is why old school prevention doesnt work. Anyone who calls themselves an aids scientist should know this. these scientists totally get it. lets hope this gel does work. if or should we say when it does, ladies get your goo-gel. i wished there was a gay version of this, unfortunately a butthole is not a vagina. you lucky girls.