Comments on: another permutation of porn adopting social media http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/11/another-permutation-of-porn-adopting-social-media.html Journalist and author Violet Blue's site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more. Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Kathryn http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/11/another-permutation-of-porn-adopting-social-media.html/comment-page-1#comment-3434 Kathryn Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:52:17 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=2228#comment-3434 I agree - this is a great direction for online porn to be going. Social media is definitely the way to bring the creative / tech communities together and it only makes sense to bring together those creative techies who are into sexy things. I agree – this is a great direction for online porn to be going. Social media is definitely the way to bring the creative / tech communities together and it only makes sense to bring together those creative techies who are into sexy things.

]]> By: Slartibartfast http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/11/another-permutation-of-porn-adopting-social-media.html/comment-page-1#comment-3413 Slartibartfast Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:19:25 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=2228#comment-3413 I honestly see more in common between Playboy and Met Art or ERROTICA. All three lead can lead to masturbation. But that is my subjective interpretation. What I would like to hear is a truly valid argument regarding anti-Playboy, anti-Met Art, anti-ERROTICA or anti-porn in general. I am unconvinced by arguments of objectification of women, commodification of sex or unrealistic beauty standards. Every anti-porn feminist has at some point masturbated to some erotic imagery (unless they are religious right-wing nuts) and the very same anti-porn arguments could be made. There will never be an absolute dividing line between "classy" and "bad" porn that all will agree upon. There will only be porn which will please some and at the same time offend others. I honestly see more in common between Playboy and Met Art or ERROTICA. All three lead can lead to masturbation. But that is my subjective interpretation. What I would like to hear is a truly valid argument regarding anti-Playboy, anti-Met Art, anti-ERROTICA or anti-porn in general. I am unconvinced by arguments of objectification of women, commodification of sex or unrealistic beauty standards. Every anti-porn feminist has at some point masturbated to some erotic imagery (unless they are religious right-wing nuts) and the very same anti-porn arguments could be made. There will never be an absolute dividing line between “classy” and “bad” porn that all will agree upon. There will only be porn which will please some and at the same time offend others.

]]>