<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the ecosexual&#8217;s case against long distance relationships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/10/the-ecosexuals-case-against-long-distance-relationships.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/10/the-ecosexuals-case-against-long-distance-relationships.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Lacina</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/10/the-ecosexuals-case-against-long-distance-relationships.html/comment-page-1#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Lacina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=2194#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  I&#039;m not buying it.  This whole article just smacks of silly hyperbole.  Slate rooting around for Digg-inspired ad revenue.  And someone trying to meet an article deadline using an over-done trend &quot;going Green&quot; where it&#039;s just silly to do so.

Besides, it&#039;s not like these people are flying private Leers.  The flights they&#039;re on are going anyway.  And technically, their constant flying is doing the economy a benefit.  They&#039;re pumping money into the system, like good little consumers.

And really, Date Local Movement?  If you really connect with someone, and have great sex, why would you give that up because Slate.com thinks it&#039;s not green?

You know what else is bad for the environment? Condoms.  Condoms are so not Green.  Mhmm.  Let&#039;s think about that for a minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  I&#8217;m not buying it.  This whole article just smacks of silly hyperbole.  Slate rooting around for Digg-inspired ad revenue.  And someone trying to meet an article deadline using an over-done trend &#8220;going Green&#8221; where it&#8217;s just silly to do so.</p>
<p>Besides, it&#8217;s not like these people are flying private Leers.  The flights they&#8217;re on are going anyway.  And technically, their constant flying is doing the economy a benefit.  They&#8217;re pumping money into the system, like good little consumers.</p>
<p>And really, Date Local Movement?  If you really connect with someone, and have great sex, why would you give that up because Slate.com thinks it&#8217;s not green?</p>
<p>You know what else is bad for the environment? Condoms.  Condoms are so not Green.  Mhmm.  Let&#8217;s think about that for a minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 18:46:51 by W3 Total Cache -->