<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the ecosexual&#8217;s case against long distance relationships</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/10/the-ecosexuals-case-against-long-distance-relationships.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/10/the-ecosexuals-case-against-long-distance-relationships.html</link>
	<description>Sex educator Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex culture commentary, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:57:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dustin Lacina</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/10/the-ecosexuals-case-against-long-distance-relationships.html/comment-page-1#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Lacina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=2194#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  I&#039;m not buying it.  This whole article just smacks of silly hyperbole.  Slate rooting around for Digg-inspired ad revenue.  And someone trying to meet an article deadline using an over-done trend &quot;going Green&quot; where it&#039;s just silly to do so.

Besides, it&#039;s not like these people are flying private Leers.  The flights they&#039;re on are going anyway.  And technically, their constant flying is doing the economy a benefit.  They&#039;re pumping money into the system, like good little consumers.

And really, Date Local Movement?  If you really connect with someone, and have great sex, why would you give that up because Slate.com thinks it&#039;s not green?

You know what else is bad for the environment? Condoms.  Condoms are so not Green.  Mhmm.  Let&#039;s think about that for a minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  I&#8217;m not buying it.  This whole article just smacks of silly hyperbole.  Slate rooting around for Digg-inspired ad revenue.  And someone trying to meet an article deadline using an over-done trend &#8220;going Green&#8221; where it&#8217;s just silly to do so.</p>
<p>Besides, it&#8217;s not like these people are flying private Leers.  The flights they&#8217;re on are going anyway.  And technically, their constant flying is doing the economy a benefit.  They&#8217;re pumping money into the system, like good little consumers.</p>
<p>And really, Date Local Movement?  If you really connect with someone, and have great sex, why would you give that up because Slate.com thinks it&#8217;s not green?</p>
<p>You know what else is bad for the environment? Condoms.  Condoms are so not Green.  Mhmm.  Let&#8217;s think about that for a minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (request URI doesn't have a trailing slash)
Database Caching 2/4 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk
Object Caching 273/273 objects using disk

Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2012-02-09 13:53:53 -->
