<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: sex and drugs, and misleading CNN article titles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/sex-and-drugs-and-misleading-cnn-article-titles.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/sex-and-drugs-and-misleading-cnn-article-titles.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaija</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/sex-and-drugs-and-misleading-cnn-article-titles.html/comment-page-1#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaija</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=2001#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>Wow...great article and quite a contrast to the CNN piece, which I would say expresses the double-standard of &quot;let&#039;s not talk openly about female sexual desire and practices/take a pill (only if prescribed by a doctor from your pharma company)&quot; while ignoring the fact that there are STILL a lot of deep social programming and shaming issues surrounding sex and masturbation for women, and for many, it takes a lot of hard work to get over them.  Though lolobeedo points out that medical dysfunction can and does occur even for women who are very comfortably with their sexuality.  I would consider myself a very independent thinker and a &quot;resister&quot; who managed to shake off or deflect much of the religious/conservative sex programming for girls, but I still wish someone would have given me Violet&#039;s list when I was a teenager or a young girl...it was still hard to get over my own ambivalence about my true sexual nature and desire and really ask for what I wanted/needed.  More women need to hear this frank advice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;great article and quite a contrast to the CNN piece, which I would say expresses the double-standard of &#8220;let&#8217;s not talk openly about female sexual desire and practices/take a pill (only if prescribed by a doctor from your pharma company)&#8221; while ignoring the fact that there are STILL a lot of deep social programming and shaming issues surrounding sex and masturbation for women, and for many, it takes a lot of hard work to get over them.  Though lolobeedo points out that medical dysfunction can and does occur even for women who are very comfortably with their sexuality.  I would consider myself a very independent thinker and a &#8220;resister&#8221; who managed to shake off or deflect much of the religious/conservative sex programming for girls, but I still wish someone would have given me Violet&#8217;s list when I was a teenager or a young girl&#8230;it was still hard to get over my own ambivalence about my true sexual nature and desire and really ask for what I wanted/needed.  More women need to hear this frank advice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolobeedo</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/sex-and-drugs-and-misleading-cnn-article-titles.html/comment-page-1#comment-2212</link>
		<dc:creator>lolobeedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=2001#comment-2212</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I was probably a bit hasty in my comments. I should add -- if anyone&#039;s curious! -- that sexual dysfunction doesn&#039;t always mean you can&#039;t have an orgasm, either. I can, it&#039;s just that I don&#039;t ever crave one or feel like I *need* one anymore. I sometimes think perhaps I don&#039;t enjoy them as much as I used to. It&#039;s very frustrating. 

Anyway, I&#039;ve spoken to my doctor about it numerous times, and she says there&#039;s basically nothing that can be done physically and recommended a sex therapist. Which I&#039;ve been putting off since it just seems so awkward to discuss in a professional setting ... but perhaps it&#039;s time I grow the ladyballs you think I have and do that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I was probably a bit hasty in my comments. I should add &#8212; if anyone&#8217;s curious! &#8212; that sexual dysfunction doesn&#8217;t always mean you can&#8217;t have an orgasm, either. I can, it&#8217;s just that I don&#8217;t ever crave one or feel like I *need* one anymore. I sometimes think perhaps I don&#8217;t enjoy them as much as I used to. It&#8217;s very frustrating. </p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ve spoken to my doctor about it numerous times, and she says there&#8217;s basically nothing that can be done physically and recommended a sex therapist. Which I&#8217;ve been putting off since it just seems so awkward to discuss in a professional setting &#8230; but perhaps it&#8217;s time I grow the ladyballs you think I have and do that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: violet</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/sex-and-drugs-and-misleading-cnn-article-titles.html/comment-page-1#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 07:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=2001#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>@ lolobeedo - I can&#039;t even begin to thank you for opening up in such honest, practical detail about the realities of what this is really like for women who are experiencing this. to me, that act -- you telling your story, challenging the assumptions, in detail -- shines an even bigger light on the huge, practically criminal element of what&#039;s missing in the reporting being done about female sexual dysfunction issues in outlets like CNN. they need -- we women NEED -- CNN and all the others to really tell the truth of what many women are *actually* going through. and they&#039;re not. to me, you&#039;re a hero for making this comment. 

and that&#039;s not to say I don&#039;t appreciate your criticism, because I do -- though I think that I&#039;d like to say in my defense that my intention was to criticize the prudishness of CNN for not openly saying what the problems really are and how they actually affect women. and especially their prudishness for painting it all over with a whitewash of medical advice. I did not mean to call women with sexual problems prudish in any way, I would never ever intend to come off like that. I was angry that CNN didn&#039;t present all the ways we can combine various tools to try and find solutions. I absolutely do not think that women who chose medical/chemical routes are prudes at all -- they are likely the opposite, even if for the sole act of standing up and saying HEY! I deserve an orgasm, maybe even a couple hundred, and you docs owe it to me just as much as men are handed the little blue pills while Big Pharma just scratches its head and goes &#039;it&#039;s complicated, that girl stuff&#039;. a prudish woman is not brave like you are. a prudish woman sits there and takes it and says nothing. but a prudish media outlet will pretend to report on a serious issue, while not really tell us what&#039;s going on or explain all the tools available to actually try and *help* someone with a sex problem. it&#039;s fucking dishonest and I&#039;m sick of it.

that said, welcome to the site. you&#039;re an approved anon commenter now, and I hope you&#039;ll tell me what&#039;s what anytime you want. I&#039;m thankful for the time, thought, consideration and ladyballs you bring to the comments here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ lolobeedo &#8211; I can&#8217;t even begin to thank you for opening up in such honest, practical detail about the realities of what this is really like for women who are experiencing this. to me, that act &#8212; you telling your story, challenging the assumptions, in detail &#8212; shines an even bigger light on the huge, practically criminal element of what&#8217;s missing in the reporting being done about female sexual dysfunction issues in outlets like CNN. they need &#8212; we women NEED &#8212; CNN and all the others to really tell the truth of what many women are *actually* going through. and they&#8217;re not. to me, you&#8217;re a hero for making this comment. </p>
<p>and that&#8217;s not to say I don&#8217;t appreciate your criticism, because I do &#8212; though I think that I&#8217;d like to say in my defense that my intention was to criticize the prudishness of CNN for not openly saying what the problems really are and how they actually affect women. and especially their prudishness for painting it all over with a whitewash of medical advice. I did not mean to call women with sexual problems prudish in any way, I would never ever intend to come off like that. I was angry that CNN didn&#8217;t present all the ways we can combine various tools to try and find solutions. I absolutely do not think that women who chose medical/chemical routes are prudes at all &#8212; they are likely the opposite, even if for the sole act of standing up and saying HEY! I deserve an orgasm, maybe even a couple hundred, and you docs owe it to me just as much as men are handed the little blue pills while Big Pharma just scratches its head and goes &#8216;it&#8217;s complicated, that girl stuff&#8217;. a prudish woman is not brave like you are. a prudish woman sits there and takes it and says nothing. but a prudish media outlet will pretend to report on a serious issue, while not really tell us what&#8217;s going on or explain all the tools available to actually try and *help* someone with a sex problem. it&#8217;s fucking dishonest and I&#8217;m sick of it.</p>
<p>that said, welcome to the site. you&#8217;re an approved anon commenter now, and I hope you&#8217;ll tell me what&#8217;s what anytime you want. I&#8217;m thankful for the time, thought, consideration and ladyballs you bring to the comments here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolobeedo</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/sex-and-drugs-and-misleading-cnn-article-titles.html/comment-page-1#comment-2200</link>
		<dc:creator>lolobeedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 06:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=2001#comment-2200</guid>
		<description>I think you are interpreting sexual dysfunction in a very different way to the CNN article. You are assuming female sexual dysfunction is due to psychological scarring, or a lack of self-knowledge or experimentation. That really isn&#039;t the case for many of us. 

Sometimes, libido just disappears for unknown reasons. Mine did a couple of years ago. I used to do all the things on your list as a matter of course; I was very sexually motivated and open-minded. Then my libido just dropped off over a period of a couple of months, and I went from masturbating or having sex daily, to literally *never* thinking about sex, unless I start to feel that it&#039;s gone a bit long without being intimate with my partner to re-connect and protect our relationship. 

I used to get really wet; now I don&#039;t at all. My clitoris used to grow and get erect; now it stays small and overly sensitive to touch. I just don&#039;t feel like sex, and my body doesn&#039;t get aroused. That is the sexual dysfunction they don&#039;t know how to treat, except with drugs. It&#039;s literally impotence, exactly like not being able to get it up. It&#039;s nothing to do with not being free or open-minded, and maybe I&#039;m being sensitive about it (it really demolishes your sense of self and sexual confidence) but I find it kind of insulting that you are assuming women with sexual problems are somehow prudish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are interpreting sexual dysfunction in a very different way to the CNN article. You are assuming female sexual dysfunction is due to psychological scarring, or a lack of self-knowledge or experimentation. That really isn&#8217;t the case for many of us. </p>
<p>Sometimes, libido just disappears for unknown reasons. Mine did a couple of years ago. I used to do all the things on your list as a matter of course; I was very sexually motivated and open-minded. Then my libido just dropped off over a period of a couple of months, and I went from masturbating or having sex daily, to literally *never* thinking about sex, unless I start to feel that it&#8217;s gone a bit long without being intimate with my partner to re-connect and protect our relationship. </p>
<p>I used to get really wet; now I don&#8217;t at all. My clitoris used to grow and get erect; now it stays small and overly sensitive to touch. I just don&#8217;t feel like sex, and my body doesn&#8217;t get aroused. That is the sexual dysfunction they don&#8217;t know how to treat, except with drugs. It&#8217;s literally impotence, exactly like not being able to get it up. It&#8217;s nothing to do with not being free or open-minded, and maybe I&#8217;m being sensitive about it (it really demolishes your sense of self and sexual confidence) but I find it kind of insulting that you are assuming women with sexual problems are somehow prudish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twizted</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/sex-and-drugs-and-misleading-cnn-article-titles.html/comment-page-1#comment-2157</link>
		<dc:creator>twizted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 05:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=2001#comment-2157</guid>
		<description>Damn straight! I had some pretty severe difficulties for years. I did not think a pill was a good solution. Based on advice from many different sources, I basically tried all of the above list. And &quot;masturbate&quot; as the number one aid is exactly where it should be. The difference in my libido: I went from a &quot;2&quot; to an &quot;8.&quot; Still working on getting to &quot;eleven.&quot;

I cannot imagine a more fun health regimen! And I have seen health benefits, the most interesting being more regular periods.

I hope someone in my (past) shoes reads this entry. Thanks for this excellent advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn straight! I had some pretty severe difficulties for years. I did not think a pill was a good solution. Based on advice from many different sources, I basically tried all of the above list. And &#8220;masturbate&#8221; as the number one aid is exactly where it should be. The difference in my libido: I went from a &#8220;2&#8243; to an &#8220;8.&#8221; Still working on getting to &#8220;eleven.&#8221;</p>
<p>I cannot imagine a more fun health regimen! And I have seen health benefits, the most interesting being more regular periods.</p>
<p>I hope someone in my (past) shoes reads this entry. Thanks for this excellent advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agile Cyborg</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/sex-and-drugs-and-misleading-cnn-article-titles.html/comment-page-1#comment-2115</link>
		<dc:creator>Agile Cyborg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 05:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=2001#comment-2115</guid>
		<description>The sexual future of the female is in many, many hands holding axes that need grinding. 

From the anti-porn Feminista to the darkly-aged Christian Fundamentalist a female, married or otherwise, certainly has a very tough road to investigate in her quest for ultimate independence.

Ultimately the list above is about mental and emotional agility and flexibility. A feature sorely lacking in the prudish and uptight.

The mental capacity to objectively orient oneself in a sea of sexual data can be a burden if rigidity and conventionality dominate cognitive function and visceral reaction.

It is almost amazing that Violet has to &#039;qualify&#039; sexual fantasy (tip 2). To many liberal minds this may seem absurd. Shockingly, it IS a necessary qualification due to the significant number of females roaming the hinterland that live in a perpetual state of sexual conviction and condemnation. I see much of this from my vantage point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sexual future of the female is in many, many hands holding axes that need grinding. </p>
<p>From the anti-porn Feminista to the darkly-aged Christian Fundamentalist a female, married or otherwise, certainly has a very tough road to investigate in her quest for ultimate independence.</p>
<p>Ultimately the list above is about mental and emotional agility and flexibility. A feature sorely lacking in the prudish and uptight.</p>
<p>The mental capacity to objectively orient oneself in a sea of sexual data can be a burden if rigidity and conventionality dominate cognitive function and visceral reaction.</p>
<p>It is almost amazing that Violet has to &#8216;qualify&#8217; sexual fantasy (tip 2). To many liberal minds this may seem absurd. Shockingly, it IS a necessary qualification due to the significant number of females roaming the hinterland that live in a perpetual state of sexual conviction and condemnation. I see much of this from my vantage point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 19:19:32 by W3 Total Cache -->