<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: rachel kramer bussel&#8217;s video spanked off vimeo, flickr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/rachel-kramer-bussel.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/rachel-kramer-bussel.html</link>
	<description>Journalist and author Violet Blue&#039;s site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Galbraith</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/rachel-kramer-bussel.html/comment-page-1#comment-2071</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Galbraith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1995#comment-2071</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d like to suggest that as the net continues to proliferate more and more graphic content, even on regular community sites, the walls are going to have to be moved slightly anyway. As far as i&#039;m aware you can host birthing videos on youtube without problem, so the above should be more than acceptable. Who&#039;s going to be first to initiate the shift, and push for redefined boundaries of acceptability though, I&#039;ve got no idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d like to suggest that as the net continues to proliferate more and more graphic content, even on regular community sites, the walls are going to have to be moved slightly anyway. As far as i&#8217;m aware you can host birthing videos on youtube without problem, so the above should be more than acceptable. Who&#8217;s going to be first to initiate the shift, and push for redefined boundaries of acceptability though, I&#8217;ve got no idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Comstock</title>
		<link>http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/07/rachel-kramer-bussel.html/comment-page-1#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Comstock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1995#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>Since when does NC-17 = not porn? The MPAA, owners of the trademark for the NC-17 rating provide no such guidance. Any film containing explicit sexuality would be given an NC-17 rating, even a Max Hardcore films found to be obscene in his recent conviction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when does NC-17 = not porn? The MPAA, owners of the trademark for the NC-17 rating provide no such guidance. Any film containing explicit sexuality would be given an NC-17 rating, even a Max Hardcore films found to be obscene in his recent conviction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk

 Served from: www.tinynibbles.com @ 2015-05-31 18:12:23 by W3 Total Cache -->