Comments on: always consider the right-leaning, fallacious source http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/05/always-consider-the-right-leaning-fallacious-source.html Journalist and author Violet Blue's site for sex and tech culture, accurate sex information, erotica and more. Tue, 26 May 2015 17:18:20 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: The Muscle Bound Geek:David Shorb http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/05/always-consider-the-right-leaning-fallacious-source.html/comment-page-1#comment-1375 The Muscle Bound Geek:David Shorb Thu, 29 May 2008 04:47:10 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1871#comment-1375 yes i find that annoying as well, sometime you just want to smack the TV. LOL Have a Great Day! David Shorb yes i find that annoying as well, sometime you just want to smack the TV. LOL

Have a Great Day!
David Shorb

]]> By: Paul Turnbull http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/05/always-consider-the-right-leaning-fallacious-source.html/comment-page-1#comment-1374 Paul Turnbull Thu, 29 May 2008 04:08:18 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1871#comment-1374 This is rather simple for me. You rock, they don't. End of story. ;) This is rather simple for me.

You rock, they don’t.

End of story.

;)

]]> By: Harlequin http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/05/always-consider-the-right-leaning-fallacious-source.html/comment-page-1#comment-1372 Harlequin Thu, 29 May 2008 01:58:09 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1871#comment-1372 It's funny. In most of the places I've been, the "alternative" papers have been pretty liberal, fairly gonzo, and generally rather amusing - in other words, usually the opposite of the local mainstream. It figures that an alternative paper in SF would be uber-conservative. I also have to say that I envy your rather liberal and progressive government. The people around here still get their chastity belts in a knot if they think anyone is having fun. Cries of "abomination!" and the like are sadly common where I currently am. It’s funny. In most of the places I’ve been, the “alternative” papers have been pretty liberal, fairly gonzo, and generally rather amusing – in other words, usually the opposite of the local mainstream. It figures that an alternative paper in SF would be uber-conservative.

I also have to say that I envy your rather liberal and progressive government. The people around here still get their chastity belts in a knot if they think anyone is having fun. Cries of “abomination!” and the like are sadly common where I currently am.

]]> By: anna http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/05/always-consider-the-right-leaning-fallacious-source.html/comment-page-1#comment-1371 anna Thu, 29 May 2008 01:43:43 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1871#comment-1371 That guy is such load of crap. I have a feeling he's a bad john. That guy is such load of crap. I have a feeling he’s a bad john.

]]> By: Mojo http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/05/always-consider-the-right-leaning-fallacious-source.html/comment-page-1#comment-1370 Mojo Thu, 29 May 2008 01:29:55 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1871#comment-1370 Oh my, that SFWeekly article is ludicrous. What exactly is his point? That we shouldn't mention sex work? Or that having better-than-average sex workers is somehow a bad thing? I haven't read the Weekly in years, and I think I'll keep not reading it. Oh my, that SFWeekly article is ludicrous. What exactly is his point? That we shouldn’t mention sex work? Or that having better-than-average sex workers is somehow a bad thing?

I haven’t read the Weekly in years, and I think I’ll keep not reading it.

]]> By: violet http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/05/always-consider-the-right-leaning-fallacious-source.html/comment-page-1#comment-1369 violet Thu, 29 May 2008 01:00:33 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1871#comment-1369 wow, great comments. David, thank you for speaking up with your support! there are a lot of self-identified republicans and conservatives that read, listen to and enjoy many facets of my work and turn the stereotype of the intolerant, no-sex republican (and christian) on its head. they write me all the time and tell me! so to me, it's really important to be reminded that people like Wachs actually *don't* speak for all right-leaning people. they just think they do, which is annoying. wow, great comments. David, thank you for speaking up with your support! there are a lot of self-identified republicans and conservatives that read, listen to and enjoy many facets of my work and turn the stereotype of the intolerant, no-sex republican (and christian) on its head. they write me all the time and tell me! so to me, it’s really important to be reminded that people like Wachs actually *don’t* speak for all right-leaning people. they just think they do, which is annoying.

]]> By: The Muscle Bound Geek:David Shorb http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/05/always-consider-the-right-leaning-fallacious-source.html/comment-page-1#comment-1367 The Muscle Bound Geek:David Shorb Wed, 28 May 2008 22:16:00 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1871#comment-1367 As a Republican, I completely support what your doing, I personally think that your complete awesomeness. You can quote me on that, and also on a bit of a professional note, my site completely endorses you and what your doing. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help out. Have a Great Day! David Shorb CEO/Founder MuscleBoundGeek.com As a Republican, I completely support what your doing, I personally think that your complete awesomeness. You can quote me on that, and also on a bit of a professional note, my site completely endorses you and what your doing. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help out.

Have a Great Day!
David Shorb
CEO/Founder
MuscleBoundGeek.com

]]> By: sfweeklysux http://www.tinynibbles.com/blogarchives/2008/05/always-consider-the-right-leaning-fallacious-source.html/comment-page-1#comment-1366 sfweeklysux Wed, 28 May 2008 21:48:33 +0000 http://www.tinynibbles.com/?p=1871#comment-1366 The SF Weekly just plain sucks. Their "writers" all seem to enjoy hating San Francisco, running with the most cariactured bullshit portrayals of SF to please Mike Lacey and the republicans in charge at the home office in Phoenix. Their cover stories lately have been the personal axe grindings of Mary Spicuzza (who literally did a whole cover story on "successful women who date losers" and another on Wikipedia because someone on Wikipedia deleted her sister's entry), and one does not learn much about um, local news. I'm kinda glad the Guardian sued them and kicked their asses. Maybe it'll mean sending some of these people back to their hometowns where they go to the Olive Garden and not be traumatized by something that Isn't Mainstream. The SF Weekly just plain sucks. Their “writers” all seem to enjoy hating San Francisco, running with the most cariactured bullshit portrayals of SF to please Mike Lacey and the republicans in charge at the home office in Phoenix.

Their cover stories lately have been the personal axe grindings of Mary Spicuzza (who literally did a whole cover story on “successful women who date losers” and another on Wikipedia because someone on Wikipedia deleted her sister’s entry), and one does not learn much about um, local news.

I’m kinda glad the Guardian sued them and kicked their asses. Maybe it’ll mean sending some of these people back to their hometowns where they go to the Olive Garden and not be traumatized by something that Isn’t Mainstream.

]]>