:: blog :: e + audiobooks :: resume + press :: podcast :: audio :: videoblog :: fotki :: flickr :: linklove :: san francisco :: my books :: plurk :: qik ::

  • *** hot sex ed ***

    :: erotica :: howto’s

    :: safer sex guide

    :: suck :: lick :: rim

    :: g-spot info

    :: unsafe sex toys

    :: sex ed podcast

    :: my sex ed books

    :: find good porn

    :: safe porn surfing

    :: info for couples

    :: info for parents

    :: sexual healing

    * * * * * * *

    :: this week’s Chronicle column

    * * * * * * *

    I am gleefully sponsored by Helio

    I use a helio ocean

    * * * * * * *

    blog archives

    * * * * * * *

    RSS: really simple stalking

    this blog * open source sex * my videos * my Fleshbot * my SF Chronicle * Fotki * Flickr * techyum * bloggers undressed

    * * * * * * *

    presents for me, if you like what you see (I haz wish lists):

    My Amazon.com Wish List

    Agent Provocateur

    Stockroom

    * * * * * * *

    I write way too much

    best women's erotica 2008

    best women’s erotica 2008

    guide to the g-spot

    the smart girl’s guide to the g-spot

    smart girl's guide to porn

    the smart girl’s guide to porn

    strap-on for couples

    the adventurous couple’s guide to strap-on sex

    lust: for women

    lust: erotic fantasies for women

    fetish sex

    fetish sex: an erotic guide for couples

    cunnilingus how-to

    the ultimate guide to cunnilingus

    fellatio how-to

    the ultimate guide to fellatio

    sweet life

    sweet life: erotic fantasies for couples

    * * * * * * *

    techyum!

    * * * * * * *

    violet blue :: flickr



    * * * * * * *

  • squid love

    * * * * * * *

    my sex ed ebooks and erotica, no DRM, all $10 and under, all money goes directly to authors:

    erotic role play
    how to kiss

    safer sex guide

    on Kindle::

    how to kiss
    creatures of the night (erotica)
    the modern safer sex guide

    * * * * * * *


    * * * * * * *

    sugardvd

    * * * * * * *

    tasteful, respectful explicit paysites I fully support (and some are friends):

    I feel myself

    I shot myself

    fucking machines

    my friends and their sex machines

    ultimate surrender

    my (feminist-identified) pals wrestle and the loser sexually submits

    andrew blake

    fun, explicit (and sometimes kinky) retro films and galleries


    girls out west - playful amateur Aussie pr0n, yay!


    for the girls - porn by women, for women


    met art - stunning fine art nudes


    hegre art, pretty euro n00dz


    gallery carre: shadow and light


    gorgeous men, beautifully displayed

    * * * * * * *

:: websluts, powered by Google   02.03.2006

magicformula.gif
While my cohorts over at Geek Entertainment TV are (allegedly) pushing t-shirts that say “I was internet famous once” (hey, where’s mine?), it simply doesn’t compare to the internet autofellatio possibilities found at the Slut-O-Meter. This wonderfully amusing timesuck harnesses the unstoppable pimp powers of Google to determine internet sluttiness: type in the webslut’s name and it searches for the name in Google, comparing the number of “safe-search” enabled vs. non-safe results. Basically, it determines sluttiness based on the number of times the ho has been searched for: it’s like Google’s bathroom wall technology.

My first slut was Antonio Banderas. Results: Promiscuity: 58.94%
Next, Eddie Codel: Promiscuity: 6.47%
Then, to my delight, David Pescovitz: 29.72%
Turns out it’s not true what they say about Phillip Torrone: 19.55%
All of our suspicions have been confirmed about Annalee Newitz: 43.24%

Come on — you know you’ll need this at SXSW. (thanks Rebecca, also seen @ Lifehacker)

Update: What’s even more geekily interesting is where Rebecca found the meter: at the Language Log, who investigated the sluttiness of “language log” vs. “language hat”. The hat was hella nastier, yo. But this all piggybacked off of Jean Veronis’ adventures in “pornometry“, how the results might be used for sexual cybersurveillance — finding a quick formula on how Google’s “safesearch” works. As most of us suspected, the results aren’t so cut-and-dried and different search engines treat language (and sex) differently, which just makes me think of BoingBoing’s excellent Defeat Censorware efforts. Though my gut feeling is that BB is less censored for their boobies and more so for their freedom of information as a news source. Because when they want your tax money, they want you to shut up, or to put you in jail, porn is inevitably the foil.

Update — reader clarification: “The Slut-o-Meter gives two measurements: Promiscuity and Popularity. The Popularity measure is just the number of times that someone has typed in that name *at the Slut-o-Meter site*. The Promiscuity measure is based on number of Google search results, which isn’t related to the number of times someone has been searched for on Google. (There’s no way to find out how many times someone has been searched for on Google.)”

Comments are closed.

← teledildonics debunking
cool stuff, new podcasts →


violet blue ® :: open source sex Entries and Comments.

this website and all pertaining work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs2.5 License